From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q9NCMwf8044296 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 07:22:59 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 53rDN0ba3DVEaUOq (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 05:24:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 08:24:40 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: xfstests 250 fail on newer kernels Message-ID: <20121023122440.GC7341@infradead.org> References: <20121019173730.GA23018@andromeda.usersys.redhat.com> <20121019215343.GX2739@dastard> <20121020112405.GA652@andromeda.usersys.redhat.com> <20121021223158.GA2739@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121021223158.GA2739@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 09:31:58AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > You can - the simplest thing to do might be just to fix the log size > for the mkfs command to 15MB (i.e. smaller than the AG size) so that > mkfs doesn't use all the space in the AG... I'd love to still have another test for the mkfs issue, though. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs