From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q9NCX3ep046254 for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 07:33:03 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id pdLVRS6QtJC47OHJ (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 05:34:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 08:34:44 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_quota: XFS_XFLAG_PROJINHERIT is only for dirs Message-ID: <20121023123444.GI7341@infradead.org> References: <5078432B.6050501@redhat.com> <20121013155205.GA11037@infradead.org> <20121013233431.GQ2739@dastard> <507A01DF.1070105@redhat.com> <20121014001412.GS2739@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121014001412.GS2739@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Eric Sandeen , xfs-oss , Dave Chinner , nscott@redhat.com On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:14:12AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > Sorry, I wasn't particularly clear - if your patch to quota goes in, > the problem goes away in future and we should simply filter the > warning in xfstests to handle the present issue.... I'd suggest to stil clear it but not warn. It's something that is a) harmless and b) could be set in normal operation for a long time. Just clear it silently and add a comment. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs