From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfsdump: Revert dump version bump for 32bit projid fix
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:31:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121026203129.GA405@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5085AB70.2060904@redhat.com>
Hey Eric,
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 03:24:16PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> commit 1e309da7a4f7e2a2f456bf6b7cea4c5f1181cd36 fixed xfsdump to
> properly save & restore the top 16 bits of a 32-bit projid, which
> otherwise was being dropped (and restored as 0) in older xfsdump.
>
> The original thought was to bump the dump version, so that we know
> whether the dump (may) have the top 16 bits filled in. In practice
> this would prevent older restores from restoring newer dumps, and
> losing the top 16 bits contained in these newer dumps.
>
> However, in hindsight this appears to be of limited value. I
> propose that the dump version change is unuseful/unwanted for a
> couple reasons:
>
> * There is no actual dump *format* change; the structure size
> is the same, and the top 16 bits were properly zeroed before; old
> restores will read these fixed dumps without problems and without
> restoring garbage. IOW, they will behave exactly as buggily as
> they did before. And worst case, if a dump containing the top 16
> bits is mangled by an old restore, this can be easily remedied by
> simply re-restoring with updated userspace.
>
> * We have no reliable method to know whether 32 bit project IDs are
> in use; the feature flag was not added to the GEOM call at the time
> of implementation. Therefore we cannot reliably bump to V4 only
> for projid32bit filesystems, and we cannot restrict V4 restores
> only to projid32bit filesystems. So the dump version is not
> useful for feature cross-checking purposes.
>
> I spoke with wkendall via email, and although he may not have given
> it the most scrutiny (having moved on from xfsdump-land), he also
> felt that a version dump may not be warranted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Pulled this into git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfsdump.git, master branch.
Regards,
Ben
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-26 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-22 20:24 [PATCH] xfsdump: Revert dump version bump for 32bit projid fix Eric Sandeen
2012-10-22 22:31 ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-23 0:05 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-10-23 19:51 ` Ben Myers
2012-10-26 20:31 ` Ben Myers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121026203129.GA405@sgi.com \
--to=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox