public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil White <pwhite@sgi.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/25] xfs: invalidate allocbt blocks moved to the free list
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:22:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121030002211.GD30227@caliban.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1351146854-19343-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

This looks OK by me.

Reviewed-by: Phil White <pwhite@sgi.com>

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 05:33:51PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> When we free a block from the alloc btree tree, we move it to the
> freelist held in the AGFL and mark it busy in the busy extent tree.
> This typically happens when we merge btree blocks.
> 
> Once the transaction is committed and checkpointed, the block can
> remain on the free list for an indefinite amount of time.  Now, this
> isn't the end of the world at this point - if the free list is
> shortened, the buffer is invalidated in the transaction that moves
> it back to free space. If the buffer is allocated as metadata from
> the free list, then all the modifications getted logged, and we have
> no issues, either. And if it gets allocated as userdata direct from
> the freelist, it gets invalidated and so will never get written.
> 
> However, during the time it sits on the free list, pressure on the
> log can cause the AIL to be pushed and the buffer that covers the
> block gets pushed for write. IOWs, we end up writing a freed
> metadata block to disk. Again, this isn't the end of the world
> because we know from the above we are only writing to free space.
> 
> The problem, however, is for validation callbacks. If the block was
> on old btree root block, then the level of the block is going to be
> higher than the current tree root, and so will fail validation.
> There may be other inconsistencies in the block as well, and
> currently we don't care because the block is in free space. Shutting
> down the filesystem because a freed block doesn't pass write
> validation, OTOH, is rather unfriendly.
> 
> So, make sure we always invalidate buffers as they move from the
> free space trees to the free list so that we guarantee they never
> get written to disk while on the free list.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c |    2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c
> index f1647ca..f7876c6 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c
> @@ -121,6 +121,8 @@ xfs_allocbt_free_block(
>  	xfs_extent_busy_insert(cur->bc_tp, be32_to_cpu(agf->agf_seqno), bno, 1,
>  			      XFS_EXTENT_BUSY_SKIP_DISCARD);
>  	xfs_trans_agbtree_delta(cur->bc_tp, -1);
> +
> +	xfs_trans_binval(cur->bc_tp, bp);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.10

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-10-30 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-25  6:33 [PATCH 00/25, V3] xfs: metadata buffer verifiers Dave Chinner
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 01/25] xfs: growfs: don't read garbage for new secondary superblocks Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  0:17   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 02/25] xfs: invalidate allocbt blocks moved to the free list Dave Chinner
2012-10-26  8:47   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-30  0:22   ` Phil White [this message]
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 03/25] xfs: make buffer read verication an IO completion function Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  0:29   ` Phil White
2012-10-30  0:45     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  0:55       ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 04/25] xfs: uncached buffer reads need to return an error Dave Chinner
2012-10-26  8:48   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-30  0:36   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 05/25] xfs: verify superblocks as they are read from disk Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  0:48   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 06/25] xfs: verify AGF blocks " Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  0:51   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 07/25] xfs: verify AGI " Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  0:53   ` Phil White
2012-10-30 22:13     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 08/25] xfs: verify AGFL " Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  1:00   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 09/25] xfs: verify inode buffers " Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  1:06   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 10/25] xfs: verify btree blocks " Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  1:14   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 11/25] xfs: verify dquot " Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  1:36   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 12/25] xfs: add verifier callback to directory read code Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  3:15   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 13/25] xfs: factor dir2 block read operations Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  3:23   ` Phil White
2012-10-30 22:16     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 14/25] xfs: verify dir2 block format buffers Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  3:26   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 15/25] xfs: factor dir2 free block reading Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:14   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 16/25] xfs: factor out dir2 data " Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:21   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 17/25] xfs: factor dir2 leaf read Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:22   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 18/25] xfs: factor and verify attr leaf reads Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:26   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 19/25] xfs: add xfs_da_node verification Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:30   ` Phil White
2012-10-30 22:23     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-31  0:23       ` Phil White
2012-10-31  0:50         ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 20/25] xfs: Add verifiers to dir2 data readahead Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:31   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 21/25] xfs: add buffer pre-write callback Dave Chinner
2012-10-26  8:50   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-30 22:30     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-31 10:20       ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-30 13:32   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 22/25] xfs: add pre-write metadata buffer verifier callbacks Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:34   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 23/25] xfs: connect up write verifiers to new buffers Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:39   ` Phil White
2012-10-30 22:34     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 24/25] xfs: convert buffer verifiers to an ops structure Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:41   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 25/25] xfs: add write verifiers to log recovery Dave Chinner
2012-10-26  8:54   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-26 20:31     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 12:23       ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-30 22:08         ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-31 10:19           ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-30 13:44   ` Phil White

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121030002211.GD30227@caliban.engr.sgi.com \
    --to=pwhite@sgi.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox