public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil White <pwhite@sgi.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/25] xfs: convert buffer verifiers to an ops structure.
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 06:41:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121030134118.GJ18595@caliban.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1351146854-19343-25-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 05:34:13PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> To separate the verifiers from iodone functions and associate read
> and write verifiers at the same time, introduce a buffer verifier
> operations structure to the xfs_buf.
> 
> This avoids the need for assigning the write verifier, clearing the
> iodone function and re-running ioend processing in the read
> verifier, and gets rid of the nasty "b_pre_io" name for the write
> verifier function pointer. If we ever need to, it will also be
> easier to add further content specific callbacks to a buffer with an
> ops structure in place.
> 
> We also avoid needing to export verifier functions, instead we
> can simply export the ops structures for those that are needed
> outside the function they are defined in.
> 
> This patch also fixes a directory block readahead verifier issue
> it exposed.
> 
> This patch also adds ops callbacks to the inode/alloc btree blocks
> initialised by growfs. These will need more work before they will
> work with CRCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_ag.h           |    4 +++
>  fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c        |   26 +++++++++++--------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.h        |    2 +-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c  |   18 +++++++------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_alloc_btree.h  |    2 ++
>  fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c    |   19 +++++++-------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.h    |    3 ++-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c         |   22 ++++++++--------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_btree.c   |   20 +++++++-------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_btree.h   |    3 +--
>  fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c        |   26 +++++++++----------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_btree.h        |    9 +++----
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c          |   63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h          |   24 ++++++++++-------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c     |   28 ++++++++++----------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.h     |    4 +--
>  fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_block.c   |   20 +++++++-------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_data.c    |   52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c    |   36 ++++++++++++++------------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_node.c    |   26 ++++++++++---------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_priv.h    |   10 ++++---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c        |   16 +++++++-----
>  fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c        |   26 ++++++++++++++++---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c       |   18 +++++++------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.h       |    2 +-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc_btree.c |   17 ++++++------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc_btree.h |    2 ++
>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c        |   22 +++++++++-------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h        |    3 +--
>  fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c       |    2 +-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c  |    2 +-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c        |   35 +++++++++++++++----------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h        |    4 +--
>  fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h        |    6 ++---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c    |    8 +++---
>  35 files changed, 346 insertions(+), 234 deletions(-)

More mechanical changes.  Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Phil White <pwhite@sgi.com>

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-30 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-25  6:33 [PATCH 00/25, V3] xfs: metadata buffer verifiers Dave Chinner
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 01/25] xfs: growfs: don't read garbage for new secondary superblocks Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  0:17   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 02/25] xfs: invalidate allocbt blocks moved to the free list Dave Chinner
2012-10-26  8:47   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-30  0:22   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 03/25] xfs: make buffer read verication an IO completion function Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  0:29   ` Phil White
2012-10-30  0:45     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  0:55       ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 04/25] xfs: uncached buffer reads need to return an error Dave Chinner
2012-10-26  8:48   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-30  0:36   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 05/25] xfs: verify superblocks as they are read from disk Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  0:48   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 06/25] xfs: verify AGF blocks " Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  0:51   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 07/25] xfs: verify AGI " Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  0:53   ` Phil White
2012-10-30 22:13     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 08/25] xfs: verify AGFL " Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  1:00   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 09/25] xfs: verify inode buffers " Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  1:06   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:33 ` [PATCH 10/25] xfs: verify btree blocks " Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  1:14   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 11/25] xfs: verify dquot " Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  1:36   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 12/25] xfs: add verifier callback to directory read code Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  3:15   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 13/25] xfs: factor dir2 block read operations Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  3:23   ` Phil White
2012-10-30 22:16     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 14/25] xfs: verify dir2 block format buffers Dave Chinner
2012-10-30  3:26   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 15/25] xfs: factor dir2 free block reading Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:14   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 16/25] xfs: factor out dir2 data " Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:21   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 17/25] xfs: factor dir2 leaf read Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:22   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 18/25] xfs: factor and verify attr leaf reads Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:26   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 19/25] xfs: add xfs_da_node verification Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:30   ` Phil White
2012-10-30 22:23     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-31  0:23       ` Phil White
2012-10-31  0:50         ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 20/25] xfs: Add verifiers to dir2 data readahead Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:31   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 21/25] xfs: add buffer pre-write callback Dave Chinner
2012-10-26  8:50   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-30 22:30     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-31 10:20       ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-30 13:32   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 22/25] xfs: add pre-write metadata buffer verifier callbacks Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:34   ` Phil White
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 23/25] xfs: connect up write verifiers to new buffers Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:39   ` Phil White
2012-10-30 22:34     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 24/25] xfs: convert buffer verifiers to an ops structure Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 13:41   ` Phil White [this message]
2012-10-25  6:34 ` [PATCH 25/25] xfs: add write verifiers to log recovery Dave Chinner
2012-10-26  8:54   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-26 20:31     ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-30 12:23       ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-30 22:08         ` Dave Chinner
2012-10-31 10:19           ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-10-30 13:44   ` Phil White

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121030134118.GJ18595@caliban.engr.sgi.com \
    --to=pwhite@sgi.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox