From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q9VAK4C3164163 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 05:20:04 -0500 Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 06:21:53 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] dmapi: build system revamp Message-ID: <20121031102153.GA1111@infradead.org> References: <20121030210152.751573876@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121030210152.751573876@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ben Myers Cc: Jan Engelhardt , Rich Johnston , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 04:01:52PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > Hi, > > Here are Jan Engelhardt's patches originally posted here > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-05/msg00323.html > as they apply to dmapi. > > Patch 2 applied without much modification, patch 3 was not necessary for dmapi, > and patch 6 did not apply at all so I implemented that. All the patches in this and the related series look good to me. but can you please remove the [PATCH N/N] already in the quilt series? Right now we have one [patch n/n] generated by quilt and then another mismatching one, which I think would even land in the git commit log. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs