public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Aaron Goulding <aarongldng@gmail.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS filesystem recovery from secondary superblocks
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 09:59:38 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121101225938.GS29378@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABJyUz+h=pZ6+2rro1PjoB1ggTAoRw+bTzc_bU7Eaec0_AUKLA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:02:28PM -0700, Aaron Goulding wrote:
> Hello! So I have an XFS filesystem that isn't mounting, and quite a long
> story as to why and what I've tried.
> 
> And before you start, yes backups are the preferred method of restoration
> at this point. Never trust your files to a single FS, etc.

It's kind of assumed knowledge round here or that there are good
reasons for not backing up the filesystem (e.g. it's hard to back up
a 500TB filesystem).

[snip raid horror story]

> Once I had the file created, I tried xfs_clean -f /mnt/restore/md0.dat to
> no luck. I used a hex editor to add XFSB to be beginning, hoping the

That won't work - the magic number is just one of many checks on the
superblock before it can be considered valid.

> recovery would just clean around the LVM data with similar results. The
> result looks like the following:
> 
> Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
> bad primary superblock - bad or unsupported version !!!

And that's the second check :/

> attempting to find secondary superblock...
> ....................................................................................................
> unable to verify superblock, continuing...
> ....................................................................................................
> unable to verify superblock, continuing...
> ....................................................................................................
> unable to verify superblock, continuing...
> ....................................................................................................
> unable to verify superblock, continuing...
> ....................................................................................................
> unable to verify superblock, continuing...
> ....................................................................................................
> unable to verify superblock, continuing...
> ....................................................................................................
> unable to verify superblock, continuing...
> ....................................................................................................
> unable to verify superblock, continuing...
> ....................................................................................................
> unable to verify superblock, continuing...
> ....................................................................................................
> unable to verify superblock, continuing...
> ....................................................................................................
> Exiting now.

So, that means if found 10 potential secondary superblocks, but
couldn't validate any of them. Can you find those superblocks and
hexdump them? something like: 

hexdump <dev or file> | grep -A 30 XFSB

Also of interest would be to hexdump the subsequent sector as well,
it should have a magic number of XAGF, and will also have a sequence
number in it that should help tell us if you've got everything in
order.

> running xfs_db /mnt/restore/md0.dat would appear to run out of memory.

No surprise there if the superblocks are toast.

> Next I tried xfs_db /dev/md1 to see if anything would load. I get the
> following:
> 
> root@jarvis:/mnt# xfs_db /dev/md1
> Floating point exception
> 
> With the following in dmesg:
> 
> [1568395.691767] xfs_db[30966] trap divide error ip:41e4b5 sp:7fff5db8ab90
> error:0 in xfs_db[400000+6a000]

what version are you running?

Cheers,

Dave.

-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-01 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-31  5:02 XFS filesystem recovery from secondary superblocks Aaron Goulding
2012-11-01  9:18 ` Emmanuel Florac
2012-11-01 22:59 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2012-11-07 15:24   ` Aaron Goulding
     [not found]     ` <CABJyUz+r7yQSswqyBng_W=fAXxTz9heb88NeiKSeFU7j4ZD=Hw@mail.gmail.com>
2012-11-08 21:02       ` Dave Chinner
     [not found]         ` <CABJyUzKy4YXVZAj=awVNfPD69eWo2mKhM7a-xWF1Vy-PD989sg@mail.gmail.com>
2012-11-09 10:48           ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-09 15:22             ` Aaron Goulding
2012-11-11  7:08               ` Aaron Goulding
2012-11-11 22:39                 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-14  3:26                   ` Aaron Goulding
2012-11-25  0:20                     ` Aaron Goulding
2012-11-11 22:36               ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121101225938.GS29378@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=aarongldng@gmail.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox