From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Remove redundant return error from xfs_difree()
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 16:05:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121102210518.GH9783@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5088BFD5.8060906@oracle.com>
Hey Jeff,
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:28:05PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
> If we can not fetch the related a.g. info when freeing a disk inode, it mostly like a
> fatal issue was occurred and with ASSERT(0) is fine, however, return XFS_ERROR(EINVAL)
> does not make sense here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c | 3 ---
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c
> index 445bf1a..b7ea965 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c
> @@ -1065,7 +1065,6 @@ xfs_difree(
> xfs_warn(mp, "%s: agno >= mp->m_sb.sb_agcount (%d >= %d).",
> __func__, agno, mp->m_sb.sb_agcount);
> ASSERT(0);
> - return XFS_ERROR(EINVAL);
> }
> agino = XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, inode);
> if (inode != XFS_AGINO_TO_INO(mp, agno, agino)) {
> @@ -1073,14 +1072,12 @@ xfs_difree(
> __func__, (unsigned long long)inode,
> (unsigned long long)XFS_AGINO_TO_INO(mp, agno, agino));
> ASSERT(0);
> - return XFS_ERROR(EINVAL);
> }
> agbno = XFS_AGINO_TO_AGBNO(mp, agino);
> if (agbno >= mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks) {
> xfs_warn(mp, "%s: agbno >= mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks (%d >= %d).",
> __func__, agbno, mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks);
> ASSERT(0);
> - return XFS_ERROR(EINVAL);
> }
> /*
> * Get the allocation group header.
Here the return of EINVAL is serving a useful purpose. The ASSERT is only
activated when xfs debug is configured on, so there is a very real chance that
you might exercise this code.
My read on this is if you pass bad args to xfs_difree it will return EINVAL.
It's just a little defensive coding but it's worth keeping. In this case it
will result in forced shutdown of the filesystem, which is much better than the
[unspecified] baddness that could happen later in xfs_difree if you have passed
in garbage args.
There... I got my FUD in for the day. ;)
Thanks for the patch, but I think we need to pass on this one.
Regards,
Ben
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-02 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-25 4:28 [PATCH] xfs: Remove redundant return error from xfs_difree() Jeff Liu
2012-11-02 21:05 ` Ben Myers [this message]
2012-11-03 4:28 ` Jeff Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121102210518.GH9783@sgi.com \
--to=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=jeff.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox