From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mkfs: update manpage to match current inode allocation behaviour
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 17:24:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121102222441.GJ9783@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5094473B.5000801@sgi.com>
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 05:20:43PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> On 10/18/12 10:42, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> >Once inode64 is the default allocator, mkfs man page needs to be updated to
> >match the current behaviour.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino<cmaiolino@redhat.com>
> >---
> > man/man8/mkfs.xfs.8 | 7 ++++---
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/man/man8/mkfs.xfs.8 b/man/man8/mkfs.xfs.8
> >index fa52152..c33cfb2 100644
> >--- a/man/man8/mkfs.xfs.8
> >+++ b/man/man8/mkfs.xfs.8
> >@@ -309,16 +309,17 @@ can be allocated to inodes. The default
> > is 25% for filesystems under 1TB, 5% for filesystems under 50TB and 1%
> > for filesystems over 50TB.
> > .IP
> >-In the default inode allocation mode, inode blocks are chosen such
> >+In the inode32 inode allocation mode, inode blocks are chosen such
> > that inode numbers will not exceed 32 bits, which restricts the inode
> > blocks to the lower portion of the filesystem. The data block
> > allocator will avoid these low blocks to accommodate the specified
> > maxpct, so a high value may result in a filesystem with nothing but
> > inodes in a significant portion of the lower blocks of the filesystem.
> >-(This restriction is not present when the filesystem is mounted with
> >+(This restriction is not present in the default inode allocation mode,
> >+i.e. when the filesystem is mounted with
> > the
> > .I "inode64"
> >-option on 64-bit platforms).
> >+option).
> > .IP
> > Setting the value to 0 means that essentially all of the filesystem
> > can become inode blocks, subject to inode32 restrictions.
>
> Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Oh, wow. That's a good candidate for the userspace release. ;)
-Ben
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-02 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-18 15:42 [PATCH] mkfs: update manpage to match current inode allocation behaviour Carlos Maiolino
2012-10-18 22:38 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-10-19 13:50 ` Carlos Maiolino
2012-11-02 22:20 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-11-02 22:24 ` Ben Myers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121102222441.GJ9783@sgi.com \
--to=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
--cc=tinguely@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox