From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/10] xfs: add minimum file size filtering to eofblocks scan
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 09:25:59 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121106222559.GI24575@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352213447-59791-10-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:50:46AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> Support minimum file size filtering in the eofblocks scan. The
> caller must set the XFS_EOF_FLAGS_MINFILESIZE flags bit and minimum
> file size value in bytes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_fs.h | 6 ++++--
> fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_fs.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_fs.h
> index 88eb1bc..082b743 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_fs.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_fs.h
> @@ -348,7 +348,8 @@ struct xfs_eofblocks {
> uid_t eof_uid;
> gid_t eof_gid;
> prid_t eof_prid;
> - __u32 pad[27];
> + __u64 eof_min_file_size;
> + __u32 pad[25];
And that's an exact example of why you should pad out to 8 byte
boundaries like I suggested earlier ;)
What this ends up with is:
prid eof_prid;
<implicit, arch dependent 4 byte hole>
__u64 eof_min_file_size;
__32 pad[25];
What you should have is something like:
prid eof_prid;
__u32 pad32;
__u64 eof_min_file_size;
__u64 pad64[12];
You should check the way the compiler sees the user visible
structures with pahole - it shows up problems like this in an
obvious manner ;)
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-06 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-06 14:50 [PATCH v6 00/10] speculative preallocation inode tracking Brian Foster
2012-11-06 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] xfs: add EOFBLOCKS inode tagging/untagging Brian Foster
2012-11-06 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] xfs: support a tag-based inode_ag_iterator Brian Foster
2012-11-06 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] xfs: create helper to check whether to free eofblocks on inode Brian Foster
2012-11-06 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] xfs: make xfs_free_eofblocks() non-static, return EAGAIN on trylock failure Brian Foster
2012-11-06 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] xfs: create function to scan and clear EOFBLOCKS inodes Brian Foster
2012-11-06 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] xfs: add XFS_IOC_FREE_EOFBLOCKS ioctl Brian Foster
2012-11-06 16:44 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-11-06 22:11 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-06 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] xfs: add inode id filtering to eofblocks scan Brian Foster
2012-11-06 16:41 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-11-06 17:57 ` Brian Foster
2012-11-06 22:17 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-06 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] xfs: support multiple inode id filtering in " Brian Foster
2012-11-06 16:48 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-11-06 22:20 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-06 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] xfs: add minimum file size filtering to " Brian Foster
2012-11-06 16:57 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-11-06 17:08 ` Roger Willcocks
2012-11-06 18:00 ` Brian Foster
2012-11-06 19:23 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-11-06 22:29 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-06 22:25 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2012-11-06 14:50 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] xfs: add background scanning to clear eofblocks inodes Brian Foster
2012-11-06 17:04 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-11-06 22:30 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-07 17:21 ` [PATCH v7 06/10] xfs: add XFS_IOC_FREE_EOFBLOCKS ioctl Brian Foster
2012-11-07 17:21 ` [PATCH v7 07/10] xfs: add inode id filtering to eofblocks scan Brian Foster
2012-11-07 20:33 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-07 17:21 ` [PATCH v7 09/10] xfs: add minimum file size " Brian Foster
2012-11-07 20:33 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-08 22:38 ` [PATCH v6 00/10] speculative preallocation inode tracking Ben Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121106222559.GI24575@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox