* [PATCH] xfs: Update inode alloc comments
@ 2012-10-20 14:08 Carlos Maiolino
2012-10-23 12:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-02 22:12 ` Ben Myers
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Carlos Maiolino @ 2012-10-20 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs
I found some out of date comments while studying the inode allocation code, so I
believe it's worth to have these comments updated.
It basically rewrites the comment regarding to "call_again" variable, which is
not used anymore, but instead, callers of xfs_ialloc() decides if it needs to be
called again relying only if ialloc_context is NULL or not.
Also did some small changes in another comment that I thought to be pertinent
to the current behaviour of these functions and some alignment on both comments.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c | 6 +++---
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 18 +++++++++---------
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c
index 445bf1a..f1a6046 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c
@@ -876,9 +876,9 @@ error0:
* This function is designed to be called twice if it has to do an allocation
* to make more free inodes. On the first call, *IO_agbp should be set to NULL.
* If an inode is available without having to performn an allocation, an inode
- * number is returned. In this case, *IO_agbp would be NULL. If an allocation
- * needes to be done, xfs_dialloc would return the current AGI buffer in
- * *IO_agbp. The caller should then commit the current transaction, allocate a
+ * number is returned. In this case, *IO_agbp is set to NULL. If an allocation
+ * needes to be done, xfs_dialloc returns the current AGI buffer in *IO_agbp.
+ * The caller should then commit the current transaction, allocate a
* new transaction, and call xfs_dialloc() again, passing in the previous value
* of *IO_agbp. IO_agbp should be held across the transactions. Since the AGI
* buffer is locked across the two calls, the second call is guaranteed to have
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index 2778258..07ddaf2 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -853,16 +853,16 @@ xfs_iread_extents(
* set according to the contents of the given cred structure.
*
* Use xfs_dialloc() to allocate the on-disk inode. If xfs_dialloc()
- * has a free inode available, call xfs_iget()
- * to obtain the in-core version of the allocated inode. Finally,
- * fill in the inode and log its initial contents. In this case,
- * ialloc_context would be set to NULL and call_again set to false.
+ * has a free inode available, call xfs_iget() to obtain the in-core
+ * version of the allocated inode. Finally, fill in the inode and
+ * log its initial contents. In this case, ialloc_context would be
+ * set to NULL.
*
- * If xfs_dialloc() does not have an available inode,
- * it will replenish its supply by doing an allocation. Since we can
- * only do one allocation within a transaction without deadlocks, we
- * must commit the current transaction before returning the inode itself.
- * In this case, therefore, we will set call_again to true and return.
+ * If xfs_dialloc() does not have an available inode, it will replenish
+ * its supply by doing an allocation. Since we can only do one
+ * allocation within a transaction without deadlocks, we must commit
+ * the current transaction before returning the inode itself.
+ * In this case, therefore, we will set ialloc_context and return.
* The caller should then commit the current transaction, start a new
* transaction, and call xfs_ialloc() again to actually get the inode.
*
--
1.7.11.7
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: Update inode alloc comments
2012-10-20 14:08 [PATCH] xfs: Update inode alloc comments Carlos Maiolino
@ 2012-10-23 12:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-02 22:12 ` Ben Myers
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2012-10-23 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos Maiolino; +Cc: xfs
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 11:08:19AM -0300, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> I found some out of date comments while studying the inode allocation code, so I
> believe it's worth to have these comments updated.
>
> It basically rewrites the comment regarding to "call_again" variable, which is
> not used anymore, but instead, callers of xfs_ialloc() decides if it needs to be
> called again relying only if ialloc_context is NULL or not.
>
> Also did some small changes in another comment that I thought to be pertinent
> to the current behaviour of these functions and some alignment on both comments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] xfs: Update inode alloc comments
2012-10-20 14:08 [PATCH] xfs: Update inode alloc comments Carlos Maiolino
2012-10-23 12:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2012-11-02 22:12 ` Ben Myers
2012-11-08 17:45 ` Ben Myers
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ben Myers @ 2012-11-02 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos Maiolino; +Cc: xfs
Hey Carlos,
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 11:08:19AM -0300, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> I found some out of date comments while studying the inode allocation code, so I
> believe it's worth to have these comments updated.
>
> It basically rewrites the comment regarding to "call_again" variable, which is
> not used anymore, but instead, callers of xfs_ialloc() decides if it needs to be
> called again relying only if ialloc_context is NULL or not.
>
> Also did some small changes in another comment that I thought to be pertinent
> to the current behaviour of these functions and some alignment on both comments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c | 6 +++---
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c
> index 445bf1a..f1a6046 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c
> @@ -876,9 +876,9 @@ error0:
> * This function is designed to be called twice if it has to do an allocation
> * to make more free inodes. On the first call, *IO_agbp should be set to NULL.
> * If an inode is available without having to performn an allocation, an inode
> - * number is returned. In this case, *IO_agbp would be NULL. If an allocation
> - * needes to be done, xfs_dialloc would return the current AGI buffer in
> - * *IO_agbp. The caller should then commit the current transaction, allocate a
> + * number is returned. In this case, *IO_agbp is set to NULL. If an allocation
> + * needes to be done, xfs_dialloc returns the current AGI buffer in *IO_agbp.
needs
Since we're at it.
Looks fine.
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] xfs: Update inode alloc comments
2012-11-02 22:12 ` Ben Myers
@ 2012-11-08 17:45 ` Ben Myers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ben Myers @ 2012-11-08 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos Maiolino; +Cc: xfs
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 05:12:44PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> Hey Carlos,
>
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 11:08:19AM -0300, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> > I found some out of date comments while studying the inode allocation code, so I
> > believe it's worth to have these comments updated.
> >
> > It basically rewrites the comment regarding to "call_again" variable, which is
> > not used anymore, but instead, callers of xfs_ialloc() decides if it needs to be
> > called again relying only if ialloc_context is NULL or not.
> >
> > Also did some small changes in another comment that I thought to be pertinent
> > to the current behaviour of these functions and some alignment on both comments.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c | 6 +++---
> > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c
> > index 445bf1a..f1a6046 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc.c
> > @@ -876,9 +876,9 @@ error0:
> > * This function is designed to be called twice if it has to do an allocation
> > * to make more free inodes. On the first call, *IO_agbp should be set to NULL.
> > * If an inode is available without having to performn an allocation, an inode
> > - * number is returned. In this case, *IO_agbp would be NULL. If an allocation
> > - * needes to be done, xfs_dialloc would return the current AGI buffer in
> > - * *IO_agbp. The caller should then commit the current transaction, allocate a
> > + * number is returned. In this case, *IO_agbp is set to NULL. If an allocation
> > + * needes to be done, xfs_dialloc returns the current AGI buffer in *IO_agbp.
> needs
>
> Since we're at it.
>
> Looks fine.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Carlos,
Committed this to git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git, master & for-next on Nov 2.
-Ben
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-11-08 17:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-10-20 14:08 [PATCH] xfs: Update inode alloc comments Carlos Maiolino
2012-10-23 12:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-02 22:12 ` Ben Myers
2012-11-08 17:45 ` Ben Myers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox