public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH v2] xfstests: get return value in seek_sanity_test
  2012-10-21 13:15 [PATCH v2] xfstests: get return value in seek_sanity_test wenqing.lz
@ 2012-10-21 13:13 ` Jie Liu
  2012-11-09  3:25 ` Zheng Liu
  2012-11-20 15:26 ` Mark Tinguely
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jie Liu @ 2012-10-21 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: wenqing.lz; +Cc: Zheng Liu, xfs

On 10/21/12 21:15, wenqing.lz wrote:
> From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
>
> In seek_sanity_test getting return value is missing.  Thus we couldn't get the
> result unless someone read the log file (e.g. # 285).
>
> CC: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
> ---
> v2 <- v1:
> 	* put return value check below the run_test()
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Could you please review this patch again?  Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Zheng
>
>  src/seek_sanity_test.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/seek_sanity_test.c b/src/seek_sanity_test.c
> index 34f5508..3897f02 100644
> --- a/src/seek_sanity_test.c
> +++ b/src/seek_sanity_test.c
> @@ -674,9 +674,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  		goto out;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < numtests; ++i) {
> +		ret = run_test(&seek_tests[i]);
>  		if (ret)
> -			goto out;
> -		run_test(&seek_tests[i]);
> +			break;
>  	}
>  
>  out:
Looks good to me, thank you!

-Jeff

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] xfstests: get return value in seek_sanity_test
@ 2012-10-21 13:15 wenqing.lz
  2012-10-21 13:13 ` Jie Liu
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: wenqing.lz @ 2012-10-21 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xfs; +Cc: Jeff Liu, Zheng Liu

From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>

In seek_sanity_test getting return value is missing.  Thus we couldn't get the
result unless someone read the log file (e.g. # 285).

CC: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
---
v2 <- v1:
	* put return value check below the run_test()

Hi Jeff,

Could you please review this patch again?  Thanks.

Regards,
Zheng

 src/seek_sanity_test.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/seek_sanity_test.c b/src/seek_sanity_test.c
index 34f5508..3897f02 100644
--- a/src/seek_sanity_test.c
+++ b/src/seek_sanity_test.c
@@ -674,9 +674,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		goto out;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < numtests; ++i) {
+		ret = run_test(&seek_tests[i]);
 		if (ret)
-			goto out;
-		run_test(&seek_tests[i]);
+			break;
 	}
 
 out:
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] xfstests: get return value in seek_sanity_test
  2012-10-21 13:15 [PATCH v2] xfstests: get return value in seek_sanity_test wenqing.lz
  2012-10-21 13:13 ` Jie Liu
@ 2012-11-09  3:25 ` Zheng Liu
  2012-11-09  5:38   ` Jeff Liu
  2012-11-09 14:30   ` Mark Tinguely
  2012-11-20 15:26 ` Mark Tinguely
  2 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Zheng Liu @ 2012-11-09  3:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xfs; +Cc: Jeff Liu, Zheng Liu

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 09:15:09PM +0800, wenqing.lz wrote:

ping?

Regards,
Zheng

> From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
> 
> In seek_sanity_test getting return value is missing.  Thus we couldn't get the
> result unless someone read the log file (e.g. # 285).
> 
> CC: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
> ---
> v2 <- v1:
> 	* put return value check below the run_test()
> 
> Hi Jeff,
> 
> Could you please review this patch again?  Thanks.
> 
> Regards,
> Zheng
> 
>  src/seek_sanity_test.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/seek_sanity_test.c b/src/seek_sanity_test.c
> index 34f5508..3897f02 100644
> --- a/src/seek_sanity_test.c
> +++ b/src/seek_sanity_test.c
> @@ -674,9 +674,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  		goto out;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < numtests; ++i) {
> +		ret = run_test(&seek_tests[i]);
>  		if (ret)
> -			goto out;
> -		run_test(&seek_tests[i]);
> +			break;
>  	}
>  
>  out:
> -- 
> 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] xfstests: get return value in seek_sanity_test
  2012-11-09  3:25 ` Zheng Liu
@ 2012-11-09  5:38   ` Jeff Liu
  2012-11-09 14:30   ` Mark Tinguely
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Liu @ 2012-11-09  5:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zheng Liu; +Cc: hch, Zheng Liu, tinguely, xfs

CC to Christoph and Mark.

Thanks,
-Jeff
On 11/09/2012 11:25 AM, Zheng Liu wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 09:15:09PM +0800, wenqing.lz wrote:
> 
> ping?
> 
> Regards,
> Zheng
> 
>> From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
>>
>> In seek_sanity_test getting return value is missing.  Thus we couldn't get the
>> result unless someone read the log file (e.g. # 285).
>>
>> CC: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
>> ---
>> v2 <- v1:
>> 	* put return value check below the run_test()
>>
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> Could you please review this patch again?  Thanks.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Zheng
>>
>>  src/seek_sanity_test.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/seek_sanity_test.c b/src/seek_sanity_test.c
>> index 34f5508..3897f02 100644
>> --- a/src/seek_sanity_test.c
>> +++ b/src/seek_sanity_test.c
>> @@ -674,9 +674,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>  		goto out;
>>  
>>  	for (i = 0; i < numtests; ++i) {
>> +		ret = run_test(&seek_tests[i]);
>>  		if (ret)
>> -			goto out;
>> -		run_test(&seek_tests[i]);
>> +			break;
>>  	}
>>  
>>  out:
>> -- 
>> 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] xfstests: get return value in seek_sanity_test
  2012-11-09  3:25 ` Zheng Liu
  2012-11-09  5:38   ` Jeff Liu
@ 2012-11-09 14:30   ` Mark Tinguely
  2012-11-17  6:06     ` Jeff Liu
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Tinguely @ 2012-11-09 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zheng Liu; +Cc: Jeff Liu, Zheng Liu, xfs

On 11/08/12 21:25, Zheng Liu wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 09:15:09PM +0800, wenqing.lz wrote:
>
> ping?
>
> Regards,
> Zheng
>
>> From: Zheng Liu<wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
>>
>> In seek_sanity_test getting return value is missing.  Thus we couldn't get the
>> result unless someone read the log file (e.g. # 285).
>>
>> CC: Jeff Liu<jeff.liu@oracle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu<wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
>> ---
>> v2<- v1:
>> 	* put return value check below the run_test()
>>
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> Could you please review this patch again?  Thanks.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Zheng
>>
>>   src/seek_sanity_test.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/seek_sanity_test.c b/src/seek_sanity_test.c
>> index 34f5508..3897f02 100644
>> --- a/src/seek_sanity_test.c
>> +++ b/src/seek_sanity_test.c
>> @@ -674,9 +674,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>   		goto out;
>>
>>   	for (i = 0; i<  numtests; ++i) {
>> +		ret = run_test(&seek_tests[i]);
>>   		if (ret)
>> -			goto out;
>> -		run_test(&seek_tests[i]);
>> +			break;
>>   	}
>>
>>   out:
>> --
>> 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Hi Jeff and Zheng,

Jeff, can I assume by your email:

   http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-10/msg00412.html

that you are giving your Reviewed-by:?

It also looks good to me too:

Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>

I will make sure it gets committed.

--Mark.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] xfstests: get return value in seek_sanity_test
  2012-11-09 14:30   ` Mark Tinguely
@ 2012-11-17  6:06     ` Jeff Liu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Liu @ 2012-11-17  6:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Tinguely; +Cc: xfs, Zheng Liu, Zheng Liu

On 11/09/2012 10:30 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> On 11/08/12 21:25, Zheng Liu wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 09:15:09PM +0800, wenqing.lz wrote:
>>
>> ping?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Zheng
>>
>>> From: Zheng Liu<wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
>>>
>>> In seek_sanity_test getting return value is missing.  Thus we couldn't get the
>>> result unless someone read the log file (e.g. # 285).
>>>
>>> CC: Jeff Liu<jeff.liu@oracle.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu<wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
>>> ---
>>> v2<- v1:
>>> 	* put return value check below the run_test()
>>>
>>> Hi Jeff,
>>>
>>> Could you please review this patch again?  Thanks.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Zheng
>>>
>>>   src/seek_sanity_test.c | 4 ++--
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/seek_sanity_test.c b/src/seek_sanity_test.c
>>> index 34f5508..3897f02 100644
>>> --- a/src/seek_sanity_test.c
>>> +++ b/src/seek_sanity_test.c
>>> @@ -674,9 +674,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>>   		goto out;
>>>
>>>   	for (i = 0; i<  numtests; ++i) {
>>> +		ret = run_test(&seek_tests[i]);
>>>   		if (ret)
>>> -			goto out;
>>> -		run_test(&seek_tests[i]);
>>> +			break;
>>>   	}
>>>
>>>   out:
>>> --
>>> 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> xfs mailing list
>> xfs@oss.sgi.com
>> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> 
> Hi Jeff and Zheng,
> 
> Jeff, can I assume by your email:
> 
>    http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-10/msg00412.html
> 
> that you are giving your Reviewed-by:?
Hi Mark,

Sure, it looks good to me. :)

Reviewed-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>

Thanks,
-Jeff
> 
> It also looks good to me too:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
> 
> I will make sure it gets committed.
> 
> --Mark.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] xfstests: get return value in seek_sanity_test
  2012-10-21 13:15 [PATCH v2] xfstests: get return value in seek_sanity_test wenqing.lz
  2012-10-21 13:13 ` Jie Liu
  2012-11-09  3:25 ` Zheng Liu
@ 2012-11-20 15:26 ` Mark Tinguely
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Tinguely @ 2012-11-20 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: wenqing.lz; +Cc: Jeff Liu, Zheng Liu, xfs

On 10/21/12 08:15, wenqing.lz wrote:
> From: Zheng Liu<wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
>
> In seek_sanity_test getting return value is missing.  Thus we couldn't get the
> result unless someone read the log file (e.g. # 285).
>
> CC: Jeff Liu<jeff.liu@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu<wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
> ---
> v2<- v1:
> 	* put return value check below the run_test()


This patch has been committed to git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfstests 
master branch, commit 7eab7e.

--Mark.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-11-20 15:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-10-21 13:15 [PATCH v2] xfstests: get return value in seek_sanity_test wenqing.lz
2012-10-21 13:13 ` Jie Liu
2012-11-09  3:25 ` Zheng Liu
2012-11-09  5:38   ` Jeff Liu
2012-11-09 14:30   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-11-17  6:06     ` Jeff Liu
2012-11-20 15:26 ` Mark Tinguely

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox