From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id qA9Hc2I5132557 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 11:38:02 -0600 Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 11:40:02 -0600 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] xfs: fs/xfs/xfs_fs_subr.c die die die Message-ID: <20121109174001.GV9783@sgi.com> References: <1352455804-17045-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1352455804-17045-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hey Dave, On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 09:10:00PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > This patch series replaces all the functions in fs/xfs/xfs_fs_subr.c > with direct calls to their VFS equivalents. This fixes bugs and > removes code at the same time. > > I haven't bothered to change the ranges passed to the functions - > that requires a lot more scrutiny and testing - the ranges have now > may not be optimal but they are a known factor. The changes have > passed smoke testing on several different configurations and about 6 > hours of continuous fsx testing, which is what I'd expect seeing as > I have changed the ranges at all. Thanks for the quick turnaround on this. It looks like this will indeed be appropriate for -stable. I'd like to have seen Andrew go through the whole process on this bug. Maybe next time. We still have the xfstest to do I guess. Putting this series on the 3.8 queue. Regards, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs