From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id qADLIOOo152410 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:18:24 -0600 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:20:27 -0600 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] xfs: fixes for 3.7-rc6 Message-ID: <20121113212027.GB19387@sgi.com> References: <1352718586-3538-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1352718586-3538-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hi Dave, On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:09:43PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > These are the remaining fixes I have in my tree for the 3.7 cycle. > One is a corruption fix, the other two are problems I'm seeing > during shutdown and recovery testing. That testing lasts 400-500 > cycles (3-4 hours) now before it fails with another, as yet unknown > buffer/perag reference assert failure. Without these fixes, it lasts > 3-4 cycles before assert failing or triggering a BUG. > > I'd like these fixes to be in the 3.7 cycle if at all possible, with > both patch 1 and 2 being stable kernel candidates. committed to git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git, master and for-next branches. I'll send a pull request tomorrow. Regards, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs