public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, Andrew Dahl <adahl@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: remove xfs_tosspages
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:29:03 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121113212903.GC19387@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121112230029.GW24575@dastard>

Hi Dave,

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:00:29AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:43:03PM -0600, Andrew Dahl wrote:
> > On 11/09/2012 04:10 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > > 
> > > It's a buggy, unnecessary wrapper that is duplicating
> > > truncate_pagecache_range().
> > > 
> > > When replacing the call in xfs_change_file_space(), also ensure that
> > > the length being allocated/freed is always positive before making
> > > any changes. These checks are done in the lower extent manipulation
> > > functions, too, but we need to do them before any page cache
> > > operations.
> > > 
> > > Reported-by: Andrew Dahl <adahl@sgi.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ....
> > > @@ -2169,7 +2186,8 @@ xfs_change_file_space(
> > >  	switch (cmd) {
> > >  	case XFS_IOC_ZERO_RANGE:
> > >  		prealloc_type |= XFS_BMAPI_CONVERT;
> > > -		xfs_tosspages(ip, startoffset, startoffset + bf->l_len, 0);
> > > +		truncate_pagecache_range(VFS_I(ip), startoffset,
> > > +			 round_down(startoffset + bf->l_len, PAGE_SIZE) - 1);
> > 
> > When calling XFS_IOC_ZERO_RANGE with a range [0, 4095] or [0,1] it's
> > tossing pages because the call to round_down() is returning 0 and
> > passing -1 in for the end will toss all pages.  So, we need to make sure
> > round_down() isn't going to return a 0, or that (startoffset +
> > bf->l_len) > PAGE_SIZE.
> 
> Right, which was the original bug. I didn't think that through
> fully....
> 
> > So, something like...
> > 
> > 
> > xfs_off_t       end;
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > if((end = round_down(startoffset + bf->l_len, PAGE_SIZE)) > 0) {
> > 	truncate_pagecache_range(VFS_I(ip), startoffset, end - 1);
> > }
> 
> Actually, it is more complex than that. Think of the range [4096,
> 4097]. That would result in passing 4096, 4095 to
> truncate_pagecache_range(), which is also wrong but implicitly
> handled correctly in truncate_inode_pages_range(). Hence it should
> be:
> 
> 		end = round_down(startoffset + bf->l_len, PAGE_SIZE) - 1;
> 		if (startoffset > end)
> 			truncate_pagecache_range(VFS_I(ip), startoffset, end);
> 
> That's similar to your original fix, which had a last < first check
> in it. I'll post a fix in a few minutes...

I'd like to pull this in tomorrow.  Could you get this one sorted out today?
If not, I think we could also enlist Andrew to fix it.

Regards,
	Ben

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-13 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-09 10:10 [PATCH 0/4] xfs: fs/xfs/xfs_fs_subr.c die die die Dave Chinner
2012-11-09 10:10 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: remove xfs_tosspages Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 20:43   ` Andrew Dahl
2012-11-12 23:00     ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-13 21:29       ` Ben Myers [this message]
2012-11-09 10:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: remove xfs_wait_on_pages() Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 20:44   ` Andrew Dahl
2012-11-09 10:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: remove xfs_flush_pages Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 20:50   ` Andrew Dahl
2012-11-09 10:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: remove xfs_flushinval_pages Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 22:38   ` Andrew Dahl
2012-11-09 17:40 ` [PATCH 0/4] xfs: fs/xfs/xfs_fs_subr.c die die die Ben Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121113212903.GC19387@sgi.com \
    --to=bpm@sgi.com \
    --cc=adahl@sgi.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox