From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/32 V2] xfs: verify dquot blocks as they are read from disk
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:33:58 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121115223358.GM14281@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50A56C2A.5000805@sgi.com>
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 04:26:50PM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> On 11/15/12 16:01, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 03:34:36PM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> >>On 11/15/12 15:16, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 03:01:49PM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> >>>>On 11/15/12 14:48, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >>>>>On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:55:47AM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> >>>>>>The xfs_quota program does not generate output with V2 which causes
> >>>>>>xfstest 050 to fails.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I don't think that has anything to do with this patch orthechange
> >>>>>for V2 - V2 only changes quotacheck behaviour, and that doesn't
> >>>>>impact xfs_quota behaviour. The test passes just fine here:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>$ sudo ./check 050
> >>>>>FSTYP -- xfs (debug)
> >>>>>PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 test-2 3.7.0-rc5-dgc+
> >>>>>MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/vdb
> >>>>>MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/vdb /mnt/scratch
> >>>>>
> >>>>>050 14s ... 15s
> >>>>>Ran: 050
> >>>>>Passed all 1 tests
> >>>>>
> >>>>>So perhaps there's something else going wrong on your machine?
> >>>
> >>>Curious. There aren't any errors in the syslog/dmesg saying that
> >>>buffers failed verification during the quota check runs, are there?
> >>>Also, what platform are you testing on?
> >>
> >>No error message in dmesg nor /var/log/messages
> >>
> >>This is a x86_64.
> >>
> >>It is running OSS with most recent commit:
> >>
> >> commit 579b62faa5fb16ffeeb88cda5e2c4e95730881af
> >>
> >>Your two series:
> >> xfs: fixes for 3.7-rc6
> >> xfs: current queue for 3.8
> >>
> >>I added the XFS_SB_VERSION2_CRCBIT attribute to xfsprogs and enabled
> >>it in mkfs.xfs and remade the test/scratch filesystems.
> >
> >That's likely your problem. Why are you testing with this bit set -
> >that's to indicate that there are on disk format changes, and none
> >of them occur in this patch set. Hence the kernel should be refusing
> >to mount any filesystem with that bit set. As such, I'm using a
> >standard userspace for all this regression testing, because
> >filesystems with the CRC bit should be failed during mount on 3.8.
> >
> >/me goes looking....
> >
> >Ok, the kernel isn't refusing to mount when that bit is set. That's
> >a bug in the patch that introduces the CRC bit that I borked when
> >splitting it out of a larger patch. I'll send an updated patch (it's
> >the xfs: add CRC infrastructure patch).
> >
>
> removing the attribute bit from the filesystem/tools does not change
> the failure on 050 with V2 patches.
Can you join #xfs on freenode so we can discuss this in realtime?
There's way too much latency on email....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-15 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-12 11:53 [PATCH 00/32] xfs: current queue for 3.8 Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 11:53 ` [PATCH 01/32] xfs: add more attribute tree trace points Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 22:11 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-11-15 16:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-12 11:53 ` [PATCH 02/32] xfs: remove xfs_tosspages Dave Chinner
2012-11-14 6:42 ` [PATCH 02/32 V2] " Dave Chinner
2012-11-14 18:50 ` Andrew Dahl
2012-11-14 18:52 ` [PATCH 02.5/32] " Andrew Dahl
2012-11-14 19:59 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-11-21 8:05 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-22 5:10 ` Andrew Dahl
2012-11-22 23:29 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-26 18:04 ` Andrew Dahl
2012-11-14 21:17 ` [PATCH 02/32 V2] " Dave Chinner
2012-11-15 16:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-12 11:53 ` [PATCH 03/32] xfs: remove xfs_wait_on_pages() Dave Chinner
2012-11-15 16:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-12 11:53 ` [PATCH 04/32] xfs: remove xfs_flush_pages Dave Chinner
2012-11-15 16:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-12 11:53 ` [PATCH 05/32] xfs: remove xfs_flushinval_pages Dave Chinner
2012-11-15 16:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-15 20:54 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-21 10:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-12 11:53 ` [PATCH 06/32] xfs: use btree block initialisation functions in growfs Dave Chinner
2012-11-13 21:18 ` Rich Johnston
2012-11-23 12:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-23 21:25 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 11:53 ` [PATCH 07/32] xfs: growfs: use uncached buffers for new headers Dave Chinner
2012-11-13 21:18 ` Rich Johnston
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 08/32] xfs: make growfs initialise the AGFL header Dave Chinner
2012-11-13 21:18 ` Rich Johnston
2012-11-23 12:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-23 21:27 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 09/32] xfs: make buffer read verication an IO completion function Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 10/32] xfs: uncached buffer reads need to return an error Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 11/32] xfs: verify superblocks as they are read from disk Dave Chinner
2012-11-23 12:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 12/32] xfs: verify AGF blocks " Dave Chinner
2012-11-13 1:09 ` Phil White
2012-11-13 3:07 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-14 6:44 ` [PATCH 12/32 V2] " Dave Chinner
2012-11-14 21:28 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 13/32] xfs: verify AGI " Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 14/32] xfs: verify AGFL " Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 15/32] xfs: verify inode buffers " Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 16/32] xfs: verify btree blocks " Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 17/32] xfs: verify dquot " Dave Chinner
2012-11-14 6:50 ` [PATCH 17/32 V2] " Dave Chinner
2012-11-15 17:55 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-11-15 20:48 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-15 21:01 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-11-15 21:16 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-15 21:34 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-11-15 22:01 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-15 22:09 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-15 22:26 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-11-15 22:33 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2012-11-16 1:22 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 18/32] xfs: add verifier callback to directory read code Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 19/32] xfs: factor dir2 block read operations Dave Chinner
2012-11-15 3:09 ` Ben Myers
2012-11-15 5:59 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 20/32] xfs: verify dir2 block format buffers Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 21/32] xfs: factor dir2 free block reading Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 22/32] xfs: factor out dir2 data " Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 23/32] xfs: factor dir2 leaf read Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 24/32] xfs: factor and verify attr leaf reads Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 25/32] xfs: add xfs_da_node verification Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 26/32] xfs: Add verifiers to dir2 data readahead Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 27/32] xfs: add buffer pre-write callback Dave Chinner
2012-11-15 6:02 ` [PATCH 27/32 REPOST] " Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 28/32] xfs: add pre-write metadata buffer verifier callbacks Dave Chinner
2012-11-14 6:52 ` [PATCH 28/32 V2] " Dave Chinner
2012-11-14 22:23 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 29/32] xfs: connect up write verifiers to new buffers Dave Chinner
2012-11-14 6:53 ` [PATCH 29/32 V2] " Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 30/32] xfs: convert buffer verifiers to an ops structure Dave Chinner
2012-11-14 6:54 ` [PATCH 30/32 V2] " Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 31/32] xfs: add CRC infrastructure Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 15:37 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-11-15 22:20 ` [PATCH 31/32 V2] " Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 11:54 ` [PATCH 32/32] xfs: add CRC checks to the log Dave Chinner
2012-11-12 15:37 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-11-13 23:26 ` [PATCH 00/32] xfs: current queue for 3.8 Ben Myers
2012-11-14 6:02 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-14 20:42 ` Ben Myers
2012-11-14 21:27 ` Ben Myers
2012-11-15 4:40 ` Ben Myers
2012-11-15 6:03 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-16 4:31 ` Ben Myers
2012-11-20 2:27 ` Ben Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121115223358.GM14281@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=tinguely@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox