From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id qAQM5Opc234395 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:05:24 -0600 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:07:36 -0600 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Remove the description about nodelaylog mount option from, the xfs document. Message-ID: <20121126220736.GG27055@sgi.com> References: <50B30B41.8040400@jp.fujitsu.com> <20121126155511.GF27055@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121126155511.GF27055@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Satoru Takeuchi Cc: xfs ML Hey Satoru, On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:55:11AM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:25:05PM +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > > From: Satoru Takeuchi > > > > nodelaylog mount option is removed by commit 93b8a585. But there still be > > the description about it in the xfs document. This patch removes it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi > > --- > > Documentation/filesystems/xfs.txt | 2 +- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs.txt > > index 3fc0c31..860b845 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs.txt > > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ When mounting an XFS filesystem, the following options are accepted. > > Issue command to let the block device reclaim space freed by the > > filesystem. This is useful for SSD devices, thinly provisioned > > LUNs and virtual machine images, but may have a performance > > - impact. This option is incompatible with the nodelaylog option. > > + impact. > > Looks good. > > Reviewed-by: Ben Myers This has been committed to git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git, master and for-next branches. It seems like your mailer replaced tabs with spaces so I cleaned that up. Just a heads-up... you may want to look into that. Thanks! Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs