From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id qAQMAfHU234721 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:10:41 -0600 Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:12:53 -0600 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: inode allocation should use unmapped buffers. Message-ID: <20121126221253.GH27055@sgi.com> References: <1353641065-14983-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1353641065-14983-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1353641065-14983-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hi Dave, On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 02:24:23PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > Inode buffers do not need to be mapped as inodes are read or written > directly from/to the pages underlying the buffer. This fixes a > regression introduced by commit 611c994 ("xfs: make XBF_MAPPED the > default behaviour"). > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner committed to git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git, master and for-next. What's with the multiple Signed-off-by? Is your cousin Dave getting involved in XFS development too? Welcome! ;) Thanks, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs