From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id qASDUnal182112 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 07:30:49 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id YzHwZmNwJ16XdPyd (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 05:33:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:33:05 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs: byte range granularity for XFS_IOC_ZERO_RANGE Message-ID: <20121128133305.GA7426@infradead.org> References: <1354068063-1692-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1354068063-1692-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1354068063-1692-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 01:01:01PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > XFS_IOC_ZERO_RANGE simply does not work properly for non page cache > aligned ranges. Neither test 242 or 290 exercise this correctly, so > the behaviour is completely busted even though the tests pass. > > Fix it to support full byte range granularity as was originally > intended for this ioctl. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner Look good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs