From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id qAT1pr7N242846 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:51:53 -0600 Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ZaF7aw9vZ4rHG5qV for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:54:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:54:06 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs: byte range granularity for XFS_IOC_ZERO_RANGE Message-ID: <20121129015406.GX6434@dastard> References: <1354068063-1692-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1354068063-1692-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20121128133305.GA7426@infradead.org> <20121129000655.GA6673@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121129000655.GA6673@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 07:06:55PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Actually this seems to trip up an assert in xfstests 290 for me: > > 290 0s ...[ 45.997814] XFS: Assertion failed: offset + len <= start_boundary || offset == start_boundary, file: fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c, line: 2153 Yes, i got that in one of my overnight QA runs. Haven't had a chance to debug it yet. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs