From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id qAUG3B88189145 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:03:11 -0600 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Gk8FFmGHws0KB0W1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:05:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 11:05:29 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: _fail in _scratch_mkfs_sized if device is too small Message-ID: <20121130160529.GC5667@infradead.org> References: <50B7ADBA.5020509@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50B7ADBA.5020509@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs-oss On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:47:22PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Without this, 273 was failing in cryptic ways for me > if the device size was < 2G. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs