public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/5] xfs: use b_maps[] for discontiguous buffers
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:18:02 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121204224938.599314438@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20121204231801.982422341@sgi.com

[-- Attachment #1: v3-1-3-xfs-use-b_maps-for-discontiguous-buffers.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3482 bytes --]

Commits starting at 77c1a08 introduced a multiple segment support
to xfs_buf. xfs_trans_buf_item_match() could not find a multi-segment
buffer in the transaction because it was looking at the single segment
block number rather than the multi-segment b_maps[0].bm.bn. This
results on a recursive buffer lock that can never be satisfied.

This patch:
 1) Changed the remaining b_map accesses to be b_maps[0] accesses.
 2) Renames the single segment b_map structure to __b_map to avoid
    future confusion.

Signed-off-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c |   12 ++++++------
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h |    6 +++---
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Index: b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
===================================================================
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ xfs_buf_get_maps(
 	bp->b_map_count = map_count;
 
 	if (map_count == 1) {
-		bp->b_maps = &bp->b_map;
+		bp->b_maps = &bp->__b_map;
 		return 0;
 	}
 
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static void
 xfs_buf_free_maps(
 	struct xfs_buf	*bp)
 {
-	if (bp->b_maps != &bp->b_map) {
+	if (bp->b_maps != &bp->__b_map) {
 		kmem_free(bp->b_maps);
 		bp->b_maps = NULL;
 	}
@@ -377,8 +377,8 @@ xfs_buf_allocate_memory(
 	}
 
 use_alloc_page:
-	start = BBTOB(bp->b_map.bm_bn) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-	end = (BBTOB(bp->b_map.bm_bn + bp->b_length) + PAGE_SIZE - 1)
+	start = BBTOB(bp->b_maps[0].bm_bn) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+	end = (BBTOB(bp->b_maps[0].bm_bn + bp->b_length) + PAGE_SIZE - 1)
 								>> PAGE_SHIFT;
 	page_count = end - start;
 	error = _xfs_buf_get_pages(bp, page_count, flags);
@@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ _xfs_buf_read(
 	xfs_buf_flags_t		flags)
 {
 	ASSERT(!(flags & XBF_WRITE));
-	ASSERT(bp->b_map.bm_bn != XFS_BUF_DADDR_NULL);
+	ASSERT(bp->b_maps[0].bm_bn != XFS_BUF_DADDR_NULL);
 
 	bp->b_flags &= ~(XBF_WRITE | XBF_ASYNC | XBF_READ_AHEAD);
 	bp->b_flags |= flags & (XBF_READ | XBF_ASYNC | XBF_READ_AHEAD);
@@ -1709,7 +1709,7 @@ xfs_buf_cmp(
 	struct xfs_buf	*bp = container_of(b, struct xfs_buf, b_list);
 	xfs_daddr_t		diff;
 
-	diff = ap->b_map.bm_bn - bp->b_map.bm_bn;
+	diff = ap->b_maps[0].bm_bn - bp->b_maps[0].bm_bn;
 	if (diff < 0)
 		return -1;
 	if (diff > 0)
Index: b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
===================================================================
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_buf {
 	struct page		**b_pages;	/* array of page pointers */
 	struct page		*b_page_array[XB_PAGES]; /* inline pages */
 	struct xfs_buf_map	*b_maps;	/* compound buffer map */
-	struct xfs_buf_map	b_map;		/* inline compound buffer map */
+	struct xfs_buf_map	__b_map;	/* inline compound buffer map */
 	int			b_map_count;
 	int			b_io_length;	/* IO size in BBs */
 	atomic_t		b_pin_count;	/* pin count */
@@ -330,8 +330,8 @@ void xfs_buf_stale(struct xfs_buf *bp);
  * In future, uncached buffers will pass the block number directly to the io
  * request function and hence these macros will go away at that point.
  */
-#define XFS_BUF_ADDR(bp)		((bp)->b_map.bm_bn)
-#define XFS_BUF_SET_ADDR(bp, bno)	((bp)->b_map.bm_bn = (xfs_daddr_t)(bno))
+#define XFS_BUF_ADDR(bp)		((bp)->b_maps[0].bm_bn)
+#define XFS_BUF_SET_ADDR(bp, bno)	((bp)->b_maps[0].bm_bn = (xfs_daddr_t)(bno))
 
 static inline void xfs_buf_set_ref(struct xfs_buf *bp, int lru_ref)
 {


_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-04 23:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-04 23:18 [PATCH v3 0/5] discontiguous buffer patches Mark Tinguely
2012-12-04 23:18 ` Mark Tinguely [this message]
2012-12-08 12:23   ` [PATCH v3 1/5] xfs: use b_maps[] for discontiguous buffers Christoph Hellwig
2012-12-04 23:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] xfs: rename bli_format to avoid confusion with bli_formats Mark Tinguely
2012-12-08 12:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-12-04 23:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] xfs: fix segment in xfs_buf_item_format_segment Mark Tinguely
2012-12-08 12:29   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-12-10  1:34     ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-04 23:18 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] xfs: fix the multi-segment log buffer format Mark Tinguely
2012-12-08 12:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-12-10  1:59     ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-04 23:18 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] xfs remove the XFS_TRANS_DEBUG routines Mark Tinguely
2012-12-08 12:39   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121204224938.599314438@sgi.com \
    --to=tinguely@sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox