From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] xfs: fix the multi-segment log buffer format
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 07:38:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121208123821.GD29107@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121204224938.906216248@sgi.com>
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 05:18:05PM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> Per Dave Chinner suggestion, this patch:
> 1) Corrects the detection of whether a multi-segment buffer is
> still tracking data.
> 2) Clears all the buffer log formats for a multi-segment buffer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c | 7 +++++--
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Index: b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
> @@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ xfs_buf_item_unlock(
> {
> struct xfs_buf_log_item *bip = BUF_ITEM(lip);
> struct xfs_buf *bp = bip->bli_buf;
> - int aborted;
> + int aborted, clean, i;
> uint hold;
>
> /* Clear the buffer's association with this transaction. */
> @@ -654,8 +654,15 @@ xfs_buf_item_unlock(
> * If the buf item isn't tracking any data, free it, otherwise drop the
> * reference we hold to it.
> */
> - if (xfs_bitmap_empty(bip->__bli_format.blf_data_map,
> - bip->__bli_format.blf_map_size))
> + clean = 1;
> + for (i = 0; i < bip->bli_format_count; i++) {
> + if (!xfs_bitmap_empty(bip->bli_formats[i].blf_data_map,
> + bip->bli_formats[i].blf_map_size)) {
> + clean = 0;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + if (clean)
> xfs_buf_item_relse(bp);
> else
> atomic_dec(&bip->bli_refcount);
Looks ok, although avoiding the clean variable would be even better:
for (i = 0; i < bip->bli_format_count; i++) {
if (!xfs_bitmap_empty(bip->bli_formats[i].blf_data_map,
bip->bli_formats[i].blf_map_size)) {
atomic_dec(&bip->bli_refcount);
goto out;
}
}
xfs_buf_item_relse(bp);
out:
bu that might be getting a bit too much into bikeshedding.
What I'm worried more about is how we semi-duplicate this bli_refcount
decrement vs xfs_buf_item_relse in xfs_trans_brelse, but use the
xfs_buf_item_dirty (aka XFS_BLI_DIRTY) check there instead.
It seems like the proper fix might be to:
- only set XFS_BLI_DIRTY in xfs_buf_item_log if we actually set
any bits in a bitmap
- use the XFS_BLI_DIRTY check in xfs_buf_item_unlock as well
- kill the useless xfs_buf_item_dirty wrapper
Probably both of these aren't worth doing it for now as we'll need to
get fixes into Linus tree quickly, so:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-08 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-04 23:18 [PATCH v3 0/5] discontiguous buffer patches Mark Tinguely
2012-12-04 23:18 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] xfs: use b_maps[] for discontiguous buffers Mark Tinguely
2012-12-08 12:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-12-04 23:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] xfs: rename bli_format to avoid confusion with bli_formats Mark Tinguely
2012-12-08 12:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-12-04 23:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] xfs: fix segment in xfs_buf_item_format_segment Mark Tinguely
2012-12-08 12:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-12-10 1:34 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-04 23:18 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] xfs: fix the multi-segment log buffer format Mark Tinguely
2012-12-08 12:38 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2012-12-10 1:59 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-04 23:18 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] xfs remove the XFS_TRANS_DEBUG routines Mark Tinguely
2012-12-08 12:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121208123821.GD29107@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=tinguely@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox