From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id qB8J7Vo6050304 for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2012 13:07:32 -0600 Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com (mail-pa0-f53.google.com [209.85.220.53]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id YMMfBVTzQ20KFTMt (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 11:09:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id hz1so1100680pad.26 for ; Sat, 08 Dec 2012 11:09:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 11:12:12 -0800 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [3.0-stable PATCH 00/36] Proposed 3.0-stable bug patches Message-ID: <20121208191212.GA3592@kroah.com> References: <20121203144208.143464631@sgi.com> <20121205214505.GG29399@dastard> <50C0D57A.9000704@sgi.com> <20121207100646.GJ27172@dastard> <20121207211536.GW27055@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121207211536.GW27055@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ben Myers Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Mark Tinguely , stable@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 03:15:36PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > Stable folk (cc'd Greg), what is your disposition with regard to proposing > patches for -stable proactively? Do we really need to have a bug report from a > 3.0-stable user for every bug we propose for 3.0-stable? My rules are if the subsystem maintainer(s) agree that the patches should be applied, and they meet the stable tree guidelines, then I accept them. So it's up to you all, I'll do whatever you suggest here. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs