public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove unneeded ASSERT from xfs_itruncate_extents
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:31:05 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130129033105.GD7255@disturbed.disaster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359381870-30908-1-git-send-email-cmaiolino@redhat.com>

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:04:30AM -0500, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> There is no reason to ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL)); twice, so,
> remove one of these ASSERT calls

Second assert is for the IOLOCK, not the ILOCK....

> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> index 66282dc..25226ea 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
> @@ -1396,8 +1396,7 @@ xfs_itruncate_extents(
>  	int			done = 0;
>  
>  	ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
> -	ASSERT(!atomic_read(&VFS_I(ip)->i_count) ||
> -	       xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL));
> +	ASSERT(!atomic_read(&VFS_I(ip)->i_count));

The code is correct. The ASSERT is testing the locking constraints on
the XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL. That is, if xfs_itruncate_extents() is called
in the VFS inode reclaim path (i.e. via xfs_inactive()), the IO lock
is not used (throws lockdep warnings). Hence the ASSERT is checking
that if we hold an inode reference, we are also holding the IO lock.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-01-29  3:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-28 14:04 [PATCH] xfs: remove unneeded ASSERT from xfs_itruncate_extents Carlos Maiolino
2013-01-28 14:14 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-01-28 16:26   ` Carlos Maiolino
2013-01-29  3:31 ` Dave Chinner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130129033105.GD7255@disturbed.disaster \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox