public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>
Cc: Andrew Dahl <adahl@sgi.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Refactor release scripts to conform to using git archive
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:37:31 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130214223731.GJ22182@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <322172909.3042470.1360880747978.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 05:25:47PM -0500, Nathan Scott wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > ...
> > 'make deb' failed for me like this:
> > 
> > signfile xfsprogs_3.1.9.dsc
> > gpg: skipped "Nathan Scott <nathans@debian.org>": secret key not
> > available
> > gpg: [stdin]: clearsign failed: secret key not available
> > 
> > dpkg-genchanges  >../xfsprogs_3.1.9_amd64.changes
> > dpkg-genchanges: including full source code in upload
> > dpkg-buildpackage: full upload; Debian-native package (full source is
> > included)
> > dpkg-buildpackage: warning: Failed to sign .dsc and .changes file
> > make: *** [deb] Error 1
> > 
> > Secure-by-default is a great idea but it seems that in this case it
> > also
> > requires that anyone who wants to do a build for debian has to do it
> > on a
> > machine with a keyring containing your secret key. ;)
> > 
> 
> Awkward.  :)

Really I don't mind.  What was your passphrase again? 

> > I think it is also reasonable for devs to be able to build test debs
> 
> *nod* ... not sure what trickery Dave had used.

I tried setting DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="-us -uc" but no luck.

> But, perhaps a better
> way to tackle this would be similar to the way the build allows extra
> configure options to be passed in.

> 
> include/builddefs: configure
>         ./configure $$LOCAL_CONFIGURE_OPTIONS
> 
> so, perhaps something like this...
> 
> # LOCAL_BUILDPACKAGE_OPTIONS="-us -uc" for unsigned debs
> deb: include/builddefs include/platform_defs.h
> ...
>         $(Q)cd $(SRCDIR) && dpkg-buildpackage $$LOCAL_BUILDPACKAGE_OPTIONS

Gotcha.  I'll take a look.  Thanks for the reviews!

-Ben

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-14 22:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <50F44B2E.9050408@sgi.com>
     [not found] ` <50F44B62.7060504@sgi.com>
2013-02-01  2:10   ` [PATCH 1/4] xfsprogs: Refactor release scripts to conform to using git archive Ben Myers
     [not found] ` <50F44B87.3040102@sgi.com>
2013-02-01  2:36   ` [PATCH 2/4] xfsdump: " Ben Myers
     [not found] ` <50F44BA5.9030509@sgi.com>
2013-02-01  2:55   ` [PATCH 3/4] xfstests: " Ben Myers
     [not found] ` <50F44BC0.80708@sgi.com>
2013-02-01 16:47   ` [PATCH 4/4] dmapi: " Ben Myers
2013-02-01 19:09 ` [PATCH 0/4] " Ben Myers
2013-02-06  1:15   ` Dave Chinner
2013-02-06  6:28     ` Nathan Scott
2013-02-06 19:31       ` [PATCH 0/4] Refactor release scripts to conform to using git?archive Ben Myers
2013-02-06 22:47       ` Dave Chinner
2013-02-14  1:08     ` [PATCH 0/4] Refactor release scripts to conform to using git archive Ben Myers
2013-02-14  2:14       ` Nathan Scott
2013-02-14 16:24         ` Ben Myers
2013-02-14 16:54           ` xfsprogs: update 'make deb' to use tarball Ben Myers
2013-02-14 22:26             ` Nathan Scott
2013-02-14 22:50             ` Dave Chinner
2013-02-14 17:31           ` xfsdump: update 'make deb' to use tarball archive Ben Myers
2013-02-14 22:27             ` Nathan Scott
2013-02-14 22:51             ` Dave Chinner
2013-02-14 22:25           ` [PATCH 0/4] Refactor release scripts to conform to using git archive Nathan Scott
2013-02-14 22:37             ` Ben Myers [this message]
2013-02-14 22:36           ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130214223731.GJ22182@sgi.com \
    --to=bpm@sgi.com \
    --cc=adahl@sgi.com \
    --cc=nathans@debian.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox