From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] fix spinlock recursion on xa_lock in xfs_buf_item_push
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:32:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130214233205.GL22182@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1360595302-15865-1-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:08:20AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here is v4 of the spinlock recursion fix. The only update is to the comment in
> patch 1. These changes have been run through the reproducer over the weekend
> without a failure.
>
> I've also run another xfstests run while including the following patch from Dave:
>
> xfs: xfs_bmap_add_attrfork_local is too generic
>
> ... due to seeing the same issue Lukas reproduced in test 013 (I saw it in 070 as
> well). That problem no longer occurs with this patch included, but I have hit
> an error in test 178 that didn't fire in my baseline run. It persists if I revert
> back to TOT, so I'm posting this set as is and I'll see if I can trace where that
> one came from...
Applied these two.
Regards,
Ben
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-14 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-11 15:08 [PATCH v4 0/2] fix spinlock recursion on xa_lock in xfs_buf_item_push Brian Foster
2013-02-11 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] xfs: recheck buffer pinned status after push trylock failure Brian Foster
2013-02-11 21:53 ` Dave Chinner
2013-02-11 15:08 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] xfs: remove log force from xfs_buf_trylock() Brian Foster
2013-02-11 21:53 ` Dave Chinner
2013-02-14 23:32 ` Ben Myers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130214233205.GL22182@sgi.com \
--to=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox