From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2DAC7F4C for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 03:43:38 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D116F8F8035 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 01:43:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from awesome.dsw2k3.info (awesome.dsw2k3.info [195.71.86.230]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 2RKUwRf6r6L3wKmj (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 01:43:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by awesome.dsw2k3.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7FBEBFF41 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:43:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from awesome.dsw2k3.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (awesome.dsw2k3.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3UzGqD5NNvmJ for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:43:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from citd.de (p4FC4A312.dip.t-dialin.net [79.196.163.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by awesome.dsw2k3.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:43:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:43:20 +0100 From: Matthias Schniedermeyer Subject: inode64 and 64bit kernel with 32bit userspace Message-ID: <20130218094320.GA24644@citd.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hi The more or less simple question is: Is the requirement for 32bit programs to support 64bit inodes the same as LFS(Large File Support)? IOW if a programs was compiled with FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 (if i remember that name correctly) should it work? So that all programs compiled in the last several years in a halfway recent distribution should be able to cope with 64bit inodes? The program i care about most is rsync and it appears to work correctly when i tested it with 2 hard-linked files (with an inode >2^32) and the option to preserve hard links. And "find" and "stat" also worked, otherwise i couldn't have found the file to test it with. ;-) -- Matthias _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs