From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B7F7F53 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:12:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069878F8035 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:12:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.143]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id n8BcqbhCLCoTULa7 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:12:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:12:48 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests 100: do not use scratch Message-ID: <20130218221248.GC26694@dastard> References: <1361173911-12422-1-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1361173911-12422-1-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Lukas Czerner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 08:51:51AM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote: > Test #100 does not use scratch device at all but it still > _require_scratch and _check_scratch_fs. This might also be a problem if > the test before this one failed and corrupted scratch partition. > > Remove the _require_scratch() and _check_scratch_fs() from the test. Actaully, I think it should be using scratch - have a look at where TEMP_DIR is located. Yeah, it's /tmp, not the scratch device. i.e. it should be using the TEST_DIR rather than tmp for building the tarball, and scratch for restoring it.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs