From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Tony Lu <zlu@tilera.com>
Cc: Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
"xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>, Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Fix possible truncation of log data in xlog_bread_noalign()
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:08:02 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130223000802.GB26081@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BAB94DBB0E89D8409949BC28AC95914C47C485E5@USMAExch1.tad.internal.tilera.com>
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 08:12:52AM +0000, Tony Lu wrote:
> I encountered the following panic when using xfs partitions as rootfs, which
> is due to the truncated log data read by xlog_bread_noalign(). We should
> extend the buffer by one extra log sector to ensure there's enough space to
> accommodate requested log data, which we indeed did in xlog_get_bp(), but we
> forgot to do in xlog_bread_noalign().
We've never done that round up in xlog_bread_noalign(). It shouldn't
be necessary as xlog_get_bp() and xlog_bread_noalign() are doing
fundamentally different things. That is, xlog_get_bp() is ensuring
the buffer is large enough for the upcoming IO that will be
requested, while xlog_bread_noalign() is simply ensuring what it is
passed is correctly aligned to device sector boundaries.
So, if you have to fudge an extra block for xlog_bread_noalign(),
that implies that what xlog_bread_noalign() was passed was probably
not correct. It also implies that you are using sector sizes larger
than 512 bytes, because that's the only time this might matter. Put
simply, this:
> XFS mounting filesystem sda2
> Starting XFS recovery on filesystem: sda2 (logdev: internal)
> XFS: xlog_recover_process_data: bad clientid
> XFS: log mount/recovery failed: error 5
> XFS: log mount failed
Is not sufficient information for me to determine if you've correctly
analysed the problem you were seeing and that this is the correct
fix for it. I don't even know what kernel you are seeing this on, or
how you are reproducing it.
Note that I'm not saying the fix isn't necessary or correct, just
that I cannot review it based this commit message. Given that this
code is essentially unchanged in behaviour since the large sector
size support was adding in 2003(*), understanding how it is
deficient is critical part of the reviewi process....
Information you need to provide so I have a chance of reviewing
whether it is correct or not:
- what kernel you saw this on,
- what the filesystem configuration was
- what workload reproduced this problem (a test case would
be nice, and xfstest even better)
- the actual contents of the log that lead to the short read
during recovery
- whether xfs_logprint was capable of parsing the log
correctly
- where in the actual log recovery process the failure
occurred (e.g. was it trying to recover transactions from
a section of a wrapped log?)
IOWs, please show your working so we can determine if this is the
root cause of the problem you are seeing. :)
(*) http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=archive/xfs-import.git;a=commitdiff;h=f14e527f411712f89178c31370b5d733ea1d0280
FWIW, I think your change might need work - there's the possibility
that is can round up the length beyond the end of the log if we ask
to read up to the last sector of the log (i.e. blkno + blklen ==
end of log) and then round up blklen by one sector....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-23 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-22 8:12 [PATCH] xfs: Fix possible truncation of log data in xlog_bread_noalign() Tony Lu
2013-02-22 19:14 ` Ben Myers
2013-02-23 8:32 ` Tony Lu
2013-02-23 0:08 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2013-02-23 7:06 ` Tony Lu
2013-02-23 23:55 ` Dave Chinner
2013-02-24 4:46 ` Tony Lu
2013-02-24 14:10 ` Dave Chinner
2013-02-26 7:28 ` Tony Lu
2013-02-26 20:52 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-01 15:51 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-03-01 20:24 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-03-04 8:32 ` Tony Lu
2013-03-04 21:03 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130223000802.GB26081@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=elder@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=zlu@tilera.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox