From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5308C7F82 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:45:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340C18F8040 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:45:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from imap.thunk.org (li9-11.members.linode.com [67.18.176.11]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id JsfkAnJtXAIXM7fz (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:45:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:45:12 -0500 From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] xfstests: Stress tests improments v5 Message-ID: <20130225154512.GA32171@thunk.org> References: <1361356935-29153-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1361356935-29153-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dmitry Monakhov Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com Hi, what's the status of this patch series? It looks like Dmitry has responded to all of Dave's concerns --- is that correct? Is there anything else we need to do before these patches get merged into the xfstests git tree? Thanks!! - Ted _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs