From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F957F5E for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:28:15 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:28:11 -0600 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] xfstests: Stress tests improments v5 Message-ID: <20130225212811.GY22182@sgi.com> References: <1361356935-29153-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> <20130225154512.GA32171@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130225154512.GA32171@thunk.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Theodore Ts'o Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Dmitry Monakhov , dchinner@redhat.com Hey Ted, On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:45:12AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > Hi, what's the status of this patch series? It looks like Dmitry has > responded to all of Dave's concerns --- is that correct? > > Is there anything else we need to do before these patches get merged > into the xfstests git tree? I think we just need a review to see if Dave's concerns have been addressed and then we're ready to go. Regards, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs