From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Matteo Frigo <athena@fftw.org>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [BUG] pvmove corrupting XFS filesystems (was Re: [BUG] Internal error xfs_dir2_data_reada_verify)
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 09:31:40 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130307223140.GU23616@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k3pjs908.fsf@fftw.org>
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 07:13:27AM -0500, Matteo Frigo wrote:
> Matteo Frigo <athena@fftw.org> writes:
>
> > Well, I don't really know anything about this topic, so I may be
> > completely off the mark, but dm-raid1.c:mirror_map() does indeed return
> > EWOULDBLOCK, and EWOULDBLOCK is #define'd to be EAGAIN, so it seems to
> > me that dm-raid1 does indeed return EAGAIN for "rw == READA" (which I
> > assume is read-ahead) if the "region is not in-sync":
> >
> > /*
> > * If region is not in-sync queue the bio.
> > */
> > if (!r || (r == -EWOULDBLOCK)) {
> > if (rw == READA)
> > return -EWOULDBLOCK;
> >
> > queue_bio(ms, bio, rw);
> > return DM_MAPIO_SUBMITTED;
> > }
>
> Dave (and others),
>
> do you have any suggestion on what should be done to fix this bug?
>
> I have tried returning -EIO instead of -EWOULDBLOCK, but xfs does not
> like that. dm-zero.c:zero_map() appears to return -EIO too, so this is
> another potential issue.
You need the XFS patch I posted so that readahead buffer
verification is avoided in the case of an error being returned from
the readahead.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-07 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-26 0:47 [BUG] Internal error xfs_dir2_data_reada_verify Matteo Frigo
2013-02-26 4:40 ` [BUG] pvmove corrupting XFS filesystems (was Re: [BUG] Internal error xfs_dir2_data_reada_verify) Dave Chinner
2013-02-26 11:29 ` Matteo Frigo
2013-02-27 1:04 ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2013-02-27 1:49 ` Dave Chinner
2013-02-27 2:21 ` Matteo Frigo
2013-02-27 2:29 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-07 12:13 ` Matteo Frigo
2013-03-07 22:31 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2013-03-07 22:50 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-08 0:09 ` Matteo Frigo
2013-03-08 1:57 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-08 11:38 ` Matteo Frigo
2013-02-27 15:07 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-02-27 15:10 ` Matteo Frigo
2013-02-27 23:07 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130307223140.GU23616@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=athena@fftw.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox