From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A3F7F4C for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:55:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F56A304039 for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 18:55:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.131]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ZXiB1JeqiaoqbjKS for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 18:55:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:55:42 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: Maximum file system size of XFS? Message-ID: <20130311015542.GA21651@dastard> References: <20130309215121.0e614ef8@thinky> <513BB7C3.4050009@redhat.com> <20130309233940.3b7c0910@thinky> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130309233940.3b7c0910@thinky> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Pascal Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 11:39:40PM +0100, Pascal wrote: > thank you for your answer. I am aware that there is a difference > between the maximum size under practical conditions and the theoretical > maximum. But I am looking for this theoretical number to use in within > in my thesis comparing file systems. Out of curiousity, what apsect of file systems are you comparing? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs