From: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Cc: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>, Julien FERRERO <jferrero06@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: XFS filesystem corruption
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:57:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201303121057.52092.Martin@lichtvoll.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130307232214.GY23616@dastard>
Am Freitag, 8. März 2013 schrieb Dave Chinner:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 02:15:31PM +0100, Julien FERRERO wrote:
> > > We actually test brutal "Power off" for xfs, ext4 and other file
> > > systems. If your storage is configured properly and you have
> > > barriers enabled, they all pass without corruption.
> > >
> > > What hardware raid cards can do is to hide a volatile write cache.
> > > Either on the raid HBA itself or, even worse, on the backend disks
> > > behind the card. S-ata disks tend to default to write cache enabled
> > > and need to be checked especially careful (sas drives tend to be
> > > write cache disabled by default).
> >
> >
> >
> > Write cache is supposed to be disabled on the H/W RAID (according to
> > hdparm) and barrier are correctly enabled since xfs does not report
> > any warning at mount.
> >
> >
> >
> > The odd thing is we never see this with kernel 2.6.18 where barriers
> > weren't yet available.
>
> Yes they were. XFS had barrier support added in 2.6.15.
I thought this was 2.6.16? Or was that the kernel where it became usable due
to the generic write barrier part being merged while the XFS one was ready
earlier?
I still remember the XFS filesystem crashes I had back then that went away
with disabling the write cache of the drive in my ThinkPad T42 back then and
where solved with 2.6.17, whereas 2.6.17.7 solved a directory corruption
issue introduced with 2.6.17. Thus I always recommended at least 2.6.17.7 in
case of write barrier usage with XFS.
Thanks,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-12 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-06 15:08 XFS filesystem corruption Julien FERRERO
2013-03-06 15:15 ` Emmanuel Florac
2013-03-06 16:16 ` Julien FERRERO
2013-03-06 16:47 ` Ric Wheeler
2013-03-06 22:21 ` Emmanuel Florac
2013-03-06 23:12 ` Ric Wheeler
2013-03-07 13:15 ` Julien FERRERO
2013-03-07 13:40 ` Ric Wheeler
2013-03-07 23:22 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-08 10:16 ` Julien FERRERO
2013-03-12 9:57 ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
2013-03-08 8:39 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-08 10:17 ` Julien FERRERO
2013-03-08 12:20 ` Ric Wheeler
2013-03-08 18:59 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-09 9:11 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-09 18:51 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-10 22:45 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-10 23:54 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-11 0:50 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-11 9:29 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-11 22:45 ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-11 9:25 ` Julien FERRERO
2013-03-12 10:54 ` Emmanuel Florac
2013-03-12 10:42 ` Martin Steigerwald
2013-03-12 22:16 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-07 3:56 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-07 13:04 ` Julien FERRERO
2013-03-07 13:32 ` Stan Hoeppner
2013-03-10 2:50 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-10 22:11 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201303121057.52092.Martin@lichtvoll.de \
--to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=jferrero06@gmail.com \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox