From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5457F74 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 07:05:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D054304048 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 05:05:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.143]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ojfVEsE8GLVV9OH2 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 05:05:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 23:05:45 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [ASSERT failure] transaction reservations changes bad? Message-ID: <20130312120545.GO21651@dastard> References: <20130312062001.GJ21651@dastard> <20130312062531.GK21651@dastard> <513EE274.6090808@oracle.com> <20130312103138.GN21651@dastard> <513F0C07.1060000@oracle.com> <513F17F3.1010204@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <513F17F3.1010204@oracle.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jeff Liu Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 07:56:35PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote: > More info, 3.7.0 is the oldest kernel on my environment, I ran into the > same problem. Thanks for following up so quickly, Jeff. So the problem is that a new test is tripping over a bug that has been around for a while, not that it is a new regression. OK, so I'll expunge that from my testing for the moment as I don't ahve time to dig in and find out what the cause is right now. If anyone else wants to.... :) Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs