From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D474B7FAA for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:39:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACADB304048 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:39:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id cCCmnuxUsJdWAqQk for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:39:19 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: 3.9-rc2 xfs panic Message-ID: <20130314233919.GC21651@dastard> References: <5913647.851698.1363248364959.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <5141CDCD.6070801@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5141CDCD.6070801@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Mark Tinguely Cc: CAI Qian , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 08:17:01AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: > On 03/14/13 03:06, CAI Qian wrote: > >This is easy to reproduce here, > > > ># ./check 111 > > > >Bisecting is under way... > > > > > Right now, xfstests 111 will cause a panic. See thread: > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-03/msg00322.html On a debug kernel, yes. On a production kernel, no. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs