From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281847F50 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:48:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7449304090 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:48:04 -0400 From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: Announce re-factor all current xfstests patches request Message-ID: <20130327214804.GA28143@thunk.org> References: <5152F2BB.4000709@sgi.com> <20130327134606.GJ5861@thunk.org> <20130327205407.GU6369@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130327205407.GU6369@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Rich Johnston , linux-btrfs , xfs-oss On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:54:07AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > Support for named tests have not yet been added. From the check > script: > > SUPPORTED_TESTS="[0-9][0-9][0-9] [0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]" Ah, I thought support for named tests was there. For right now, though, if we have test ext4/123 and btrfs/123, that's OK and they are considered separate tests, right? Or do we still need to keep the numbers unique for now? - Ted _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs