From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3CED7F37 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:05:07 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82CCD8F80AD for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:05:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.131]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id UQ2wEGU29l6nXEqF for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:05:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:05:26 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: xfs_repair misses an fs error? Message-ID: <20130416220526.GE13938@destitution> References: <20130416162557.GD13938@destitution> <6qi04axkbr.ln2@goaway.wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6qi04axkbr.ln2@goaway.wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Keith Keller Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:44:54AM -0700, Keith Keller wrote: > On 2013-04-16, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > Not recently. What version of xfs_repair are you using? > > Hmm, perhaps this is a difference. I believe (though, again I did very > poor logging, and I apologize) that the initial repair used 3.1.1. The > recent successful repair definitely used 3.1.10. Is it possible 3.1.1 > is old enough that it might not have caught the issues I reported from > the 3.1.10 log? Yes - there have been problems like this fixed since 3.1.1... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs