public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
	Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: shutdown filesystem if xfs_perag_get fails
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:32:04 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130426013204.GW30622@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366929706.4098.6.camel@chandra-dt.ibm.com>

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 05:41:46PM -0500, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> In which case something along the lines of
> 
> --- 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> index 3806088..3fb2fa6 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> @@ -203,7 +203,13 @@ xfs_perag_get(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_agnumber_t
> agno)
>         if (pag) {
>                 ASSERT(atomic_read(&pag->pag_ref) >= 0);
>                 ref = atomic_inc_return(&pag->pag_ref);
> -       }
> +       } else 
> +               /*
> +                * xfs_perag_get() is called with invalid agno,
> +                * which cannot happen. This indicates a problem
> +                * in the calling code.
> +                */
> +               BUG();

That's btrfs-style error handling. ;)

In reality, your patch is much worse than just letting the caller
dereference a null pointer, because it happens inside an RCU read
lock. That's guaranteed to hang the system, not just have the thread
that triggers a null pointer dereference go away. And further....

>         rcu_read_unlock();
>         trace_xfs_perag_get(mp, agno, ref, _RET_IP_);

... it means we can't catch the tracepoint with the bad agno in it.

>         return pag;
> --------
> 
> would be useful ?. Since we have a NULL pag, we will trip somewhere
> else. At least with this, there is a pointer to the debugger/sysadmin
> about where/what to look for (may be with more valuable/correct comment
> than above).

The current failure case is pretty damn obvious, so adding a BUG
doesn't make it any better. In fact, it makes it worse because it
prevents a caller from being able to handle a NULL perag return....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-26  1:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20130419204102.736961610@sgi.com>
2013-04-21 17:41 ` [PATCH] xfs: shutdown filesystem if xfs_perag_get fails Mark Tinguely
2013-04-21 21:55   ` Eric Sandeen
2013-04-22 13:45     ` Mark Tinguely
2013-04-22 14:32       ` Eric Sandeen
2013-04-22 15:11         ` Mark Tinguely
2013-04-22 23:30           ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-23 13:48             ` Mark Tinguely
2013-04-23 15:54               ` Chandra Seetharaman
2013-04-23 20:49                 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-25 22:41                   ` Chandra Seetharaman
2013-04-26  1:32                     ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2013-04-26 15:32                     ` Mark Tinguely
2013-04-26 16:07                       ` Ben Myers
2013-04-29 22:30                         ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130426013204.GW30622@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=tinguely@sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox