public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [BULK]  Re: [PATCH] xfstests 311: test fsync with dm flakey V2
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 08:49:37 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130426224937.GA23072@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130426223214.GA4117@localhost.localdomain>

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 06:32:14PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 04:05:22PM -0600, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 03:31:01PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 08:12:14PM -0600, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > > Ok so I think I'll just make this test do all the iterations of the fsync tester
> > > > > with and without --nolockfs, since without --nolockfs I'm still seeing problems,
> > > > > does that sound reasonable?
> > > > 
> > > > Sounds like a fine plan to me ;)
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Btw its test 19 O_DIRECT that gives me a 0 length file, the buffered case is
> > > fine.  The test just does a randomly sized sub-block sized write over and over
> > > again for a random number of times and fsync()'s in there randomly.  The number
> > > is 3072 because that's the largest inline extent we can have in btrfs, I added
> > > it specifically to test our inline extent logging.  Thanks,
> > 
> > Interesting - it only runs fsync every 8 iterations of the loop. Can
> > you check that it is running enough loops to execute a fsync?
> > 
> 
> If the loop doesn't fsync it still fsyncs before the program exits.

Doh! I noticed that yesterday but forgot about it. Not enough
coffee. I'll have a closer look, then.

> Side note I once wasted a week because Chris's fsync tester
> _didn't_ fsync() before exit so it would tell you a md5sum of a
> file that hadn't fsync()ed before the md5sum and I just assumed
> btrfs was broken.  This test does not make this mistake for that
> reason :).  Thanks,

I think we've all made mistakes like that at least once.... :/

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

      reply	other threads:[~2013-04-26 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-25 14:12 [PATCH] xfstests 311: test fsync with dm flakey V2 Josef Bacik
2013-04-25 22:45 ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-26  0:24   ` [BULK] " Josef Bacik
2013-04-26  1:08     ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-26  1:32       ` Josef Bacik
2013-04-26  2:12         ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-26 19:31           ` Josef Bacik
2013-04-26 22:05             ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-26 22:32               ` Josef Bacik
2013-04-26 22:49                 ` Dave Chinner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130426224937.GA23072@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=jbacik@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox