From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6264429DF8 for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 07:28:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B9FAC004 for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 05:28:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id IUbs7Zp1lCxl4BKU for ; Mon, 06 May 2013 05:28:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 22:28:44 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: 3.9.0: general protection fault Message-ID: <20130506122844.GL19978@dastard> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Bernd Schubert Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:14:22AM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote: > And anpther protection fault, this time with 3.9.0. Always happens > on one of the servers. Its ECC memory, so I don't suspect a faulty > memory bank. Going to fsck now- http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_What_information_should_I_include_when_reporting_a_problem.3F > > >[303340.514052] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC > >[303340.517913] Modules linked in: fhgfs(O) fhgfs_client_opentk(O) Kernel tainted with out of tree modules. Can you reproduce the problem with them? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs