public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs: introduce CONFIG_XFS_WARN
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 19:02:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130508000222.GS29359@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367321976-18268-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 09:39:34PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> Running a CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG kernel in production environments is not
> the best idea as it introduces significant overhead, can change
> the behaviour of algorithms (such as allocation) to improve test
> coverage, and (most importantly) panic the machine on non-fatal
> errors.
> 
> There are many cases where all we want to do is run a
> kernel with more bounds checking enabled, such as is provided by the
> ASSERT() statements throughout the code, but without all the
> potential overhead and drawbacks.
> 
> This patch converts all the ASSERT statements to evaluate as
> WARN_ON(1) statements and hence if they fail dump a warning and a
> stack trace to the log. This has minimal overhead and does not
> change any algorithms, and will allow us to find strange "out of
> bounds" problems more easily on production machines.
> 
> There are a few places where assert statements contain debug only
> code. These are converted to be debug-or-warn only code so that we
> still get all the assert checks in the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

Applied.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-08  0:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-30 11:39 [PATCH 0/4] xfs: fixes for 3.10 merge window Dave Chinner
2013-04-30 11:39 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: Teach dquot recovery about CONFIG_XFS_QUOTA Dave Chinner
2013-04-30 18:22   ` Ben Myers
2013-04-30 11:39 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: introduce CONFIG_XFS_WARN Dave Chinner
2013-05-08  0:02   ` Ben Myers [this message]
2013-04-30 11:39 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: Remote attr validation fixes and optimisations Dave Chinner
2013-04-30 21:31   ` Ben Myers
2013-04-30 22:16     ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-30 11:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: fix da node magic number mismatches Dave Chinner
2013-04-30 21:33   ` Ben Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130508000222.GS29359@sgi.com \
    --to=bpm@sgi.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox