From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE56F7F37 for ; Wed, 15 May 2013 16:32:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCDD230405F for ; Wed, 15 May 2013 14:32:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.143]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id h6ewOIEqWGDssEcd for ; Wed, 15 May 2013 14:32:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 07:32:25 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 311: fsck the dmflakey device instead of the real device V2 Message-ID: <20130515213225.GY24635@dastard> References: <1368631217-15511-1-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1368631217-15511-1-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Josef Bacik Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:20:17AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > Dave pointed out that xfs was having issues with 311 because of caching issues. > He suggested that I fsck the dm-flakey device to make sure we don't have this > problem. Make _check_scratch_fs take an optional argument to use as the device > to fsck. Thanks, > > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik > --- > V1->V2: make _check_scratch_fs() take the optional argument of the device to > check Looks fine from here... Acked-by: Dave Chinner -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs