public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] xfs: avoid nesting transactions in xfs_qm_scall_setqlim()
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 13:35:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130521183544.GK20028@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1369123330-9579-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 06:02:00PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> 
> Lockdep reports:
> 
> =============================================
> [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> 3.9.0+ #3 Not tainted
> ---------------------------------------------
> setquota/28368 is trying to acquire lock:
>  (sb_internal){++++.?}, at: [<c11e8846>] xfs_trans_alloc+0x26/0x50
> 
> but task is already holding lock:
>  (sb_internal){++++.?}, at: [<c11e8846>] xfs_trans_alloc+0x26/0x50
> 
> from xfs_qm_scall_setqlim()->xfs_dqread() when a dquot needs to be
> allocated.
> 
> xfs_qm_scall_setqlim() is starting a transaction and then not
> passing it into xfs_qm_dqet() and so it starts it's own transaction
> when allocating the dquot.  Splat!
> 
> Fix this by not allocating the dquot in xfs_qm_scall_setqlim()
> inside the setqlim transaction. This requires getting the dquot
> first (and allocating it if necessary) then dropping and relocking
> the dquot before joining it to the setqlim transaction.
> 
> Reported-by: Michael L. Semon <mlsemon35@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-21 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-21  8:01 [PATCH 00/11] xfs: fixes for 3.10-rc3 Dave Chinner
2013-05-21  8:02 ` [PATCH 01/11] xfs: avoid nesting transactions in xfs_qm_scall_setqlim() Dave Chinner
2013-05-21 18:35   ` Ben Myers [this message]
2013-05-21  8:02 ` [PATCH 02/11] xfs: remote attribute allocation may be contiguous Dave Chinner
2013-05-21  8:02 ` [PATCH 03/11] xfs: remote attribute read too short Dave Chinner
2013-05-21 20:59   ` Ben Myers
2013-05-21 22:53     ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-21  8:02 ` [PATCH 04/11] xfs: remote attribute tail zeroing does too much Dave Chinner
2013-05-21 22:31   ` Ben Myers
2013-05-21 22:55     ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-21  8:02 ` [PATCH 05/11] xfs: correctly map remote attr buffers during removal Dave Chinner
2013-05-22 17:01   ` Ben Myers
2013-05-21  8:02 ` [PATCH 06/11] xfs: fully initialise temp leaf in xfs_attr3_leaf_unbalance Dave Chinner
2013-05-22 20:50   ` Ben Myers
2013-05-22 23:54     ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-23 22:51       ` Ben Myers
2013-05-21  8:02 ` [PATCH 07/11] xfs: fully initialise temp leaf in xfs_attr3_leaf_compact Dave Chinner
2013-05-22 21:59   ` Ben Myers
2013-05-22 23:58     ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-23 22:51       ` Ben Myers
2013-05-21  8:02 ` [PATCH 08/11] xfs: don't emit v5 superblock warnings on write Dave Chinner
2013-05-22 22:26   ` Ben Myers
2013-05-23  0:03     ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-23 15:23       ` Ben Myers
2013-05-23 23:13         ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-21  8:02 ` [PATCH 09/11] xfs: rework remote attr CRCs Dave Chinner
2013-05-23 21:54   ` Ben Myers
2013-05-23 23:35     ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-21  8:02 ` [PATCH 10/11] xfs: fix incorrect remote symlink block count Dave Chinner
2013-05-24 20:36   ` Ben Myers
2013-05-24 20:39     ` Ben Myers
2013-05-24 23:41       ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-25 15:16         ` Ben Myers
2013-05-21  8:02 ` [PATCH 11/11] xfs: increase number of ACL entries for V5 superblocks Dave Chinner
2013-05-21 14:00   ` Brian Foster
2013-05-21 20:27     ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-21 16:26 ` [PATCH 00/11] xfs: fixes for 3.10-rc3 Ben Myers
2013-05-21 20:24   ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-21 20:52     ` Ben Myers
2013-05-21 21:27       ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-23 12:30 ` [PATCH 0/2] xfs: more " Dave Chinner
2013-05-23 12:30   ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: rework dquot CRCs Dave Chinner
2013-05-23 12:30   ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: fix split buffer vector log recovery support Dave Chinner
2013-05-24  8:58   ` [patch 0/2] xfs: yet more fixes for 3.10-rc3 Dave Chinner
2013-05-24  8:58     ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: disable swap extents ioctl on CRC enabled filesystems Dave Chinner
2013-05-24  8:58     ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: kill suid/sgid through the truncate path Dave Chinner
2013-05-24 10:02       ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-05-24 10:07         ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-05-24 18:29 ` [PATCH 00/11] xfs: fixes for 3.10-rc3 Ben Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130521183544.GK20028@sgi.com \
    --to=bpm@sgi.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox