Re: generic/258 questions (mount issue)...

[Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>]

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 08:43:13PM -0400, Michael L. Semon wrote:
> Hi!  When using xfstests generic/258 with along with $TEST_RTDEV
> $TEST_LOGDEV, it tends to scream bloody murder about corrupted
> partitions and such.  In fact, the commands in the test seem to do
> the right thing when executed by hand.  So once again, I grasped for
> straws and came up with this:
> 
> --- xfstests/tests/generic/258.orig	2013-05-21 20:19:38.430754829 -0400
> +++ xfstests/tests/generic/258	2013-05-21 20:10:11.509021368 -0400
> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
>  # unmount, remount, and check the timestamp
>  echo "Remounting to flush cache"
>  umount $TEST_DEV
> -mount $TEST_DEV $TEST_DIR
> +_test_mount
> 
>  # Should yield -315593940 (prior to epoch)
>  echo "Testing for negative seconds since epoch"
> 
> My questions are these:
> 
> 1) Was there a better way to do this?

No, your change is correct. Can you clean up the description of the
problem you had and add a Signed-off-by?

> 2) Not knowing the policy on umounting $TEST_DEV, could this have
> been a test for $SCRATCH_DEV?

There are a handful of other tests that also unmount the TEST_DEV.
Perhaps adding a _test_umount() wrapper to common/rc (similar to
_scratch_umount) would be best. At least shared/243 needs the same
_test_mount treatment as this test.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs