Lockdep message on 3.9.3 (already fixed?)...

* Lockdep message on 3.9.3 (already fixed?)...
@ 2013-05-21 16:21 Michael L. Semon
  2013-05-23  6:38 ` Dave Chinner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael L. Semon @ 2013-05-21 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xfs

Hi!  I'm beginning to lose track of lockdep messages and feel like a new 
message is sneaking in there.

This lockdep comes from kernel 3.9.3, which I was asked to use in order 
to gather DRM info.  The PC was booted to a console and left to do a 
long 24kB/s download and default distro cron duties (slocate and such), 
in hopes that console inactivity, console blanking, and monitor sleep 
would kick up a soft oops from DRM like it does on 3.10.0-rc.

This may also apply to the devel kernels, but the PC needs to be left 
alone for me to verify this.

I've read the Dave Chinner position on stable kernels but don't know if 
they apply to the first stable kernel out of mainline...especially 
because that kernel has a lifespan of a housefly nowadays...

As always, thanks for reading!

Michael

=================================
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
3.9.3 #1 Not tainted
---------------------------------
inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-R} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage.
kswapd0/18 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
  (&(&ip->i_lock)->mr_lock){++++-?}, at: [<c120e2ea>] xfs_ilock+0xff/0x15e
{RECLAIM_FS-ON-R} state was registered at:
   [<c10638e7>] mark_held_locks+0x80/0xcb
   [<c1063e18>] lockdep_trace_alloc+0x59/0x9d
   [<c10a9846>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x70/0x6f2
   [<c10a9ee4>] __get_free_pages+0x1c/0x3d
   [<c1025644>] pte_alloc_one_kernel+0x14/0x16
   [<c10beb1b>] __pte_alloc_kernel+0x16/0x71
   [<c10c8380>] vmap_page_range_noflush+0x12e/0x13c
   [<c10c9480>] vm_map_ram+0x3b9/0x46c
   [<c11c0739>] _xfs_buf_map_pages+0x5b/0xe7
   [<c11c1372>] xfs_buf_get_map+0x67/0x13a
   [<c11c1ff2>] xfs_buf_read_map+0x1f/0xc0
   [<c11c20da>] xfs_buf_readahead_map+0x47/0x57
   [<c11ffc18>] xfs_da_reada_buf+0xaf/0xbd
   [<c120276c>] xfs_dir2_data_readahead+0x2f/0x36
   [<c11c4a22>] xfs_dir_open+0x7b/0x8e
   [<c10d3e77>] do_dentry_open.isra.16+0xf8/0x1d7
   [<c10d4bcf>] finish_open+0x1b/0x27
   [<c10e004c>] do_last+0x44d/0xc68
   [<c10e090b>] path_openat+0xa4/0x3cb
   [<c10e0c5d>] do_filp_open+0x2b/0x70
   [<c10d4fa2>] do_sys_open+0xf5/0x1b5
   [<c10d50b2>] sys_openat+0x26/0x28
   [<c158d678>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
irq event stamp: 266081
hardirqs last  enabled at (266081): [<c158cf19>] 
_raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x2b
hardirqs last disabled at (266080): [<c158ce0c>] 
_raw_spin_lock_irq+0x14/0x4b
softirqs last  enabled at (264480): [<c1031e7b>] __do_softirq+0x125/0x1bc
softirqs last disabled at (264455): [<c1032025>] irq_exit+0x63/0x65

other info that might help us debug this:
  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0
        ----
   lock(&(&ip->i_lock)->mr_lock);
   <Interrupt>
     lock(&(&ip->i_lock)->mr_lock);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by kswapd0/18:
  #0:  (shrinker_rwsem){++++..}, at: [<c10afe9b>] shrink_slab+0x2f/0x29b
  #1:  (&type->s_umount_key#18){++++.+}, at: [<c10d72ba>] 
grab_super_passive+0x38/0x72
  #2:  (&pag->pag_ici_reclaim_lock){+.+...}, at: [<c11ca176>] 
xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag+0xb4/0x37f

stack backtrace:
Pid: 18, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 3.9.3 #1
Call Trace:
  [<c1584cd9>] print_usage_bug+0x1dc/0x1e6
  [<c1062f8a>] ? check_usage_backwards+0xea/0xea
  [<c1063850>] mark_lock+0x245/0x25c
  [<c1064f50>] __lock_acquire+0x5da/0x1557
  [<c104fce4>] ? finish_task_switch.constprop.80+0x3b/0xb9
  [<c158b73d>] ? __schedule+0x2ae/0x5e5
  [<c10664bc>] lock_acquire+0x7f/0xdc
  [<c120e2ea>] ? xfs_ilock+0xff/0x15e
  [<c104abf0>] down_write_nested+0x41/0x61
  [<c120e2ea>] ? xfs_ilock+0xff/0x15e
  [<c120e2ea>] xfs_ilock+0xff/0x15e
  [<c11c9ea8>] xfs_reclaim_inode+0xf4/0x30e
  [<c11ca32c>] xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag+0x26a/0x37f
  [<c11ca19f>] ? xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag+0xdd/0x37f
  [<c1063a1a>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xe8/0x160
  [<c1063a9d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd
  [<c1051124>] ? try_to_wake_up+0xe1/0x122
  [<c10511ac>] ? wake_up_process+0x1f/0x33
  [<c12275e3>] ? xfs_ail_push+0x68/0x6f
  [<c122763d>] ? xfs_ail_push_all+0x53/0x6a
  [<c11ca4bf>] xfs_reclaim_inodes_nr+0x2d/0x33
  [<c11d1bbe>] xfs_fs_free_cached_objects+0x13/0x15
  [<c10d73c5>] prune_super+0xd1/0x15c
  [<c10affaf>] shrink_slab+0x143/0x29b
  [<c10b2671>] kswapd+0x54b/0x794
  [<c10b2126>] ? try_to_free_pages+0x61f/0x61f
  [<c1046a1b>] kthread+0x9e/0xa0
  [<c158dcb7>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x28
  [<c104697d>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x5b/0x5b

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread