From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24CB97F37 for ; Thu, 23 May 2013 17:51:23 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 17:51:22 -0500 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] xfs: fully initialise temp leaf in xfs_attr3_leaf_unbalance Message-ID: <20130523225122.GU20028@sgi.com> References: <1369123330-9579-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1369123330-9579-7-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20130522205059.GP20028@sgi.com> <20130522235450.GO29466@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130522235450.GO29466@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 09:54:50AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 03:50:59PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 06:02:05PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > From: Dave Chinner > > > > > > xfs_attr3_leaf_unbalance() uses a temporary buffer for recombining > > > the entries in two leaves when the destination leaf requires > > > compaction. The temporary buffer ends up being copied back over the > > > original destination buffer, so the header in the temporary buffer > > > needs to contain all the information that is in the destination > > > buffer. > > > > > > To make sure the temporary buffer is fully initialised, once we've > > > set up the temporary incore header appropriately, write is back to > > > the temporary buffer before starting to move entries around. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner > > > > > > --- > > > fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- > > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c > > > index 0bce1b3..79ece72 100644 > > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c > > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c > > > @@ -2181,14 +2181,24 @@ xfs_attr3_leaf_unbalance( > > > struct xfs_attr_leafblock *tmp_leaf; > > > struct xfs_attr3_icleaf_hdr tmphdr; > > > > > > - tmp_leaf = kmem_alloc(state->blocksize, KM_SLEEP); > > > - memset(tmp_leaf, 0, state->blocksize); > > > - memset(&tmphdr, 0, sizeof(tmphdr)); > > > + tmp_leaf = kmem_zalloc(state->blocksize, KM_SLEEP); > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * Copy the header into the temp leaf so that all the stuff > > > + * not in the incore header is present and gets copied back in > > > + * once we've moved all the entries. > > > + */ > > > + memcpy(tmp_leaf, save_leaf, xfs_attr3_leaf_hdr_size(save_leaf)); > > > > > > + memset(&tmphdr, 0, sizeof(tmphdr)); > > > tmphdr.magic = savehdr.magic; > > > tmphdr.forw = savehdr.forw; > > > tmphdr.back = savehdr.back; > > > tmphdr.firstused = state->blocksize; > > > + > > > + /* write the header to the temp buffer to initialise it */ > > > + xfs_attr3_leaf_hdr_to_disk(tmp_leaf, &tmphdr); > > > + > > > > Hrm. It seemed like the memset 0 for the incore temp header should have been > > enough for the purposes of moveents. Why did you have to add this additional > > hdr_to_disk? > > Because we've modified the tmphdr so it is different to what is in > the tmp_leaf, and I'm being paranoid and not making any assumptions > that a callee doesn't reread the tmphdr from the tmp_leaf. > > i.e. I'm initialising both the on-disk and the incore headers to > be identical before we do anything else. Once bitten, twice shy. Reviewed-by: Ben Myers _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs