From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/9] xfs: fix dir3 freespace block corruption
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 14:15:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130530191553.GG20932@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130528083717.GU29466@dastard>
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 06:37:17PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> When the directory freespace index grows to a second block (2017
> 4k data blocks in the directory), the initialisation of the second
> new block header goes wrong. The write verifier fires a corruption
> error indicating that the block number in the header is zero. This
> was being tripped by xfs/110.
>
> The problem is that the initialisation of the new block is done just
> fine in xfs_dir3_free_get_buf(), but the caller then users a dirv2
> structure to zero on-disk header fields that xfs_dir3_free_get_buf()
> has already zeroed. These lined up with the block number in the dir
> v3 header format.
>
> While looking at this, I noticed that the struct xfs_dir3_free_hdr()
> had 4 bytes of padding in it that wasn't defined as padding or being
> zeroed by the initialisation. Add a pad field declaration and fully
> zero the on disk and in-core headers in xfs_dir3_free_get_buf() so
> that this is never an issue in the future. Note that this doesn't
> change the on-disk layout, just makes the 32 bits of padding in the
> layout explicit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_format.h | 1 +
> fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_node.c | 13 ++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_format.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_format.h
> index a3b1bd8..995f1f5 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_format.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_format.h
> @@ -715,6 +715,7 @@ struct xfs_dir3_free_hdr {
> __be32 firstdb; /* db of first entry */
> __be32 nvalid; /* count of valid entries */
> __be32 nused; /* count of used entries */
> + __be32 pad; /* 64 bit alignment. */
Yeah, my count also puts nused short of 64 bit alignment. Looks ok.
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-30 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-27 6:38 [PATH 0/9] xfs: fixes for 3.10-rc4 Dave Chinner
2013-05-27 6:38 ` [PATCH 1/9] xfs: don't emit v5 superblock warnings on write Dave Chinner
2013-05-29 16:39 ` Brian Foster
2013-05-30 17:49 ` Ben Myers
2013-06-11 6:05 ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-11 21:29 ` Ben Myers
2013-05-27 6:38 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: fix incorrect remote symlink block count Dave Chinner
2013-05-29 16:39 ` Brian Foster
2013-05-30 0:46 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-30 17:49 ` Ben Myers
2013-05-27 6:38 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: increase number of ACL entries for V5 superblocks Dave Chinner
2013-05-29 16:40 ` Brian Foster
2013-05-27 6:38 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: rework dquot CRCs Dave Chinner
2013-05-29 18:58 ` Brian Foster
2013-05-30 1:00 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-30 12:02 ` Brian Foster
2013-06-03 4:12 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-27 6:38 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: fix split buffer vector log recovery support Dave Chinner
2013-05-29 19:21 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-05-30 17:49 ` Ben Myers
2013-05-27 6:38 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: disable swap extents ioctl on CRC enabled filesystems Dave Chinner
2013-05-28 21:49 ` Ben Myers
2013-05-30 1:07 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-29 21:06 ` Brian Foster
2013-05-30 17:56 ` Ben Myers
2013-05-27 6:38 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: kill suid/sgid through the truncate path Dave Chinner
2013-05-30 14:17 ` Brian Foster
2013-05-30 15:52 ` Ben Myers
2013-05-30 16:02 ` Brian Foster
2013-05-30 17:07 ` Ben Myers
2013-05-27 6:38 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: add fsgeom flag for v5 superblock support Dave Chinner
2013-05-29 15:10 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-05-29 21:43 ` Ben Myers
2013-05-29 21:47 ` Ben Myers
2013-05-30 1:28 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-30 1:11 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-30 14:17 ` Brian Foster
2013-05-30 17:57 ` Ben Myers
2013-05-27 6:38 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: inode unlinked list needs to recalculate the inode CRC Dave Chinner
2013-05-28 11:51 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-28 20:36 ` [PATCH 9a,9b v2, replacements] xfs: unlinked list crcs Dave Chinner
2013-05-28 20:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: fix log recovery transaction item reordering Dave Chinner
2013-05-28 20:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: inode unlinked list needs to recalculate the inode CRC Dave Chinner
2013-05-30 14:17 ` Brian Foster
2013-05-30 20:27 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-28 8:37 ` [PATCH 10/9] xfs: fix dir3 freespace block corruption Dave Chinner
2013-05-30 19:15 ` Ben Myers [this message]
2013-05-31 21:54 ` Ben Myers
2013-05-28 17:56 ` [PATH 0/9] xfs: fixes for 3.10-rc4 Ben Myers
2013-05-28 23:54 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-29 19:01 ` Ben Myers
2013-05-29 19:27 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-05-29 19:45 ` Ben Myers
2013-05-28 21:27 ` [PATCH 11/9] xfs: fix remote attribute invalidation for a leaf Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130530191553.GG20932@sgi.com \
--to=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox