From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: attack upon XFS, misinformation abounds, linux-raid list
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:02:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130610200216.GQ20932@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B45CFD.20500@hardwarefreak.com>
Hey Stan,
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 05:46:21AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> In a recent linux-raid list thread here:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=137072140106867&w=2
>
> seriously flawed arguments against the reliability of XFS, and even the
> performance of XFS, are made. The OP even quotes Dave's LCA
> presentation as a performance reason to avoid XFS. The party really
> gets started at paragraph 7.
>
> I made a brief effort to debunk his claims and explained that he can't
> have O_PONIES, that he should use fsync or O_DIRECT, etc for data
> safety. To non experts/advanced filesystem users, his long winded
> argument may be persuasive. Obviously none of you experts has time to
> debunk every such post, but this one may be worth a read at least,
> especially given the weight Google gives to vger lists.
I gave it a quick read, but since I'm not on linux-raid I don't have a good way
to reply to Steve. Could you bounce that message over? I'd be happy to try to
address a point or two...
Thanks,
Ben
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-10 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-09 10:46 attack upon XFS, misinformation abounds, linux-raid list Stan Hoeppner
2013-06-09 12:13 ` Ric Wheeler
2013-06-10 9:43 ` Stefan Ring
2013-06-10 13:44 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-06-10 20:02 ` Ben Myers [this message]
2013-06-11 7:12 ` Steve Bergman
2013-06-12 1:12 ` Stan Hoeppner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130610200216.GQ20932@sgi.com \
--to=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox